The resignation of Paul Farbrace, some say, has plunged Sri
Lanka Cricket into crisis. That’s
interesting. First of all there’s this
question: when was Sri Lanka Cricket ever not in crisis? Sri Lanka has enjoyed unbelievable success
over the past two decades and one is compelled to say it is not because of the
cricket authorities but in spite of them.
So if anyone is down in the mouth about Farbrace quitting, it’s time to
get a grip, get real and turn those lips in the opposite direction.
Sure, the timing could have been better. Farbrace is set to take up a coaching job
with England’s cricket team which is about to host the very players the man was
in charge of until a few days ago.
Someone might say ‘that’s not cricket’ but that someone must be totally
oblivious to what ‘cricket’ has come to mean in recent years: bucks, contracts and
careers. Farbrace cannot be blamed for
playing cricket the way it is being played all over the world.
Sure, Sri Lanka enjoyed a dream run during his tenure,
winning the Asia Cup and the World T20.
He must have contributed in some way, no one will deny that. It was not a one-man show however, and not in
the sense that some officials of Sri Lanka Cricket make that claim. There was Marvan Atapattu, Chaminda Vaas and Ruwan
Kalpage. There were the selectors led by
Sanath Jayasuriya who had to double up as peace-maker between players and
officials on more than one occasion. And
there were the men who did battle out there in the middle even as they were
being treated shabbily by the authorities.
All these ‘other’ pieces of the
puzzle are intact including the officials (maybe they unintentionally spurred
the players on, who knows?). For these
reasons, Farbrace’s leaving is not the end of the world and not the end of cricket
in Sri Lanka.
Farbrace is gone. He’s
taken whatever ‘secrets’ he (and the England and Wales Cricket Board) believe
would be useful for England as they take on Sri Lanka. All that’s water under the bridge. Happens.
Got to live with it. It is not
the ideal situation to have a general pledge allegiance to the enemy just
before battle of course, but there’s precious little anyone can do about
it.
All that Sri Lanka can do about it is to remind themselves
that the challenge got a bit stiffer.
More importantly, Matthews and his men call it what it is, an insult,
and take strength from how Sri Lanka has responded to insult on previous
occasions: with greater determination, greater focus and greater sense of
team/collective.
First, there was 1996 and the deliberate, ill-willed and
consorted attack on Muttiah Muralitharan.
Of course it would be erroneous to draw a straight line from the
infamous ‘no-balling’ to the World Cup victory in Lahore a few months later,
but few would deny that Arjuna Ranatunga’s team was not bowled over but rather
found in the world fiasco a reservoir of strength to draw from at will.
More recently Sri Lanka was insulted by India. We saw this during IPL 2013 when Tamil Nadu
politics spilled into the cricket grounds.
Sri Lankan players were no-balled and stumped even before they could
step into the ground. There was also the
‘Big Three Coup’ that amounted to short-changing other test-playing countries,
including Sri Lanka. The IPL, during
this year’s auction, roundly snubbed Sri Lanka.
Then there’s the annual Geneva Circus which India uses as arm-twisting
instrument to get Sri Lanka to toe the Indian line. Like in the Australian case, one can draw a
straight line from all this to the T20 World Cup final where Sri Lanka beat
India. The cricketers went about their
business professionally. However, if
they needed an extra ounce or two of determination, there were ample stocks to
draw from. With respect to India.
It’s not about revenge, no.
It’s about thinking ‘Ok buddy, you’ve insulted us, that’s ok, but
remember that it empowers rather than diminishes us’.
There’s a lot to win in England and not just because of Paul
Farbrace’s ‘crossover’ (should we call it 'crossback' I wonder) . There’s also a
man called David Cameron whose bad memory and worse knowledge of history makes
him insult the intelligence of the world (Sri Lanka included) at every
turn. There all the loot robbed over a
century and a half which no one in England want to return. There’s genocide that no one in England dare
talk about.
Forget all that.
It’s about cricket.
Get what inspiration you can but in the end, it’s down to the
basics. Playing to one’s strengths. Giving one’s best to the team. Serving one’s country with pride. Do that,
and Paul Farbrace might squirm a little.
The important thing is not to play to make him squirm, but to come out
with all guns firing. If targets are
achieved, don’t look at Paul. If Paul looks
your way, give him the Murali-Treatment.
Just smile. That should suffice.
For now, just say ‘Thanks Paul, go well’.
Yes, after protesting his affinity for Sri Lanka and all that, to walk away just before the England tour is rather unworthy and unashamedly unethical both by him and more so by the unprincipled ECB
ReplyDeletethe best riposte the Sri Lankan team could give is to go to England and perform well and put them to shame.
Go Sri Lanka Go !