If there is one geographical shape that describes the
world, its history and ways, it is the sphere, which of course is but made of a
multiplicity of circles. The long
journey ends at home. We find answers
not in fruit but in root. We started
‘Green’, vilified it as ‘backward’ and ‘archaic’, steamed ahead to ‘Black’, got
upset with the colour, called it ‘Brown’ and now talk about getting back to
‘Green’, almost as though we are talking of going to another planet.
Forty eight years ago, in Geneva, Switzerland, at the
plenary session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
(UNCTAD) the head of the Cuban delegation, Ernesto Che Guevara, spoke about the
political economy of trade agreements.
The following are two pertinent sections of that speech.
‘If at this
egalitarian conference, where all nations can express, through their votes the
hopes of their peoples, a solution satisfactory to the majority can be reached,
a unique step will have been taken in the history of the world. However, there
are many forces at work to prevent this from happening. The responsibility for
the decisions to be taken devolves upon the representatives of the
underdeveloped peoples. If all the peoples who live under precarious economic
conditions, and who depend on foreign powers for some vital aspects of their
economy and for their economic and social structure, are capable of resisting
the temptations, offered coldly although in the heat of the moment, and impose
a new type of relationship here, mankind will have taken a step forward.
‘If, on the other
hand, the groups of underdeveloped countries, lured by the siren song of the
vested interests of the developed powers which exploit their backwardness,
contend futilely among themselves for the crumbs from the tables of the world's
mighty, and break the ranks of numerically superior forces; or if they are not
capable of insisting on clear agreements, free from escape clauses open to
capricious interpretations; of if they rest content with agreements that can
simply be violated at will by the mighty, our efforts will have been to no
avail, and the long deliberations at this conference will result in nothing
more than innocuous files in which the international bureaucracy will zealously
guard the tons of printed paper and kilometers of magnetic tape recording the
opinions expressed by the participants. And the world will remain as it is.’
We are not talking of ‘trade’ here. We are talking
however of ‘development’. We are talking
of and in a world of power and powerlessness, domination and subjugation, the
appearance of egalitarianism and the reality of inequality. And we talk in a world which has generated
tons of printed paper, kilometers of magnetic tape and innumerable numbers of
other storage devices but has for the most part ‘remained as it was’.
And so we’ve come to this
moment when it is abundantly clear that where there was green there was
collective and when collective was dismantled green bled to brown and
black. We can talk the talk, play the word-games that have
currency, channel truths through frames that are pretty but make for the
sustainable development of systems that scorched the earth. We can do
otherwise.
0 comments:
Post a Comment