[This was a piece published in the 'Daily Mirror' on November 30, 2010, when Pakistan's then President, Asif Ali Zardari was visiting, a day or two after India's then Minister of External Affairs and done his come-see-judge-sentence number. No Indians around these days, but Pakistani President Nawaz Sharif is here. So here goes...]
I am not a student of political science. I can’t claim to have had any formal training in the field of international relations. I am not a historian. Nor a ‘South Asianist’ (yes, there are people who call themselves that). I am appalled sometimes, though, by the pronouncements and by the sheer absence of integrity and shame on the part of those who are. Still, since I am acutely aware of my deficiencies, academic ones in particular, I take the trouble to read up on things I am ignorant of. I am also not ashamed to ask questions.
‘Did
‘Did Pakistan arm-twist our Government into amending the Constitution and thereby setting in motion a sequence of events that resulted in some 60,000 unarmed men and women being slaughtered?’ I continued. Bodhi looked at me if I was brain-dead. ‘That was
I wanted to get it all right: ‘Wasn’t it Pakistan that provided shelter to, set up training camps for, armed and funded terrorist groups that took on the Sri Lankan state in armed insurrection and committed all manner of terrorist acts including many that would be termed ‘crimes against humanity’ and ‘genocide’, not to mention ‘ethnic cleansing’?’ ‘Wrong,’ he said softly, looking me in the eye, ‘it was
‘Didn’t
I went back to the papers.
Lots of photo-ops. Lots of
promises. Niceties. Bonhomie. Good
neighbourliness.
Since I am not an expert, I took out my political magnifying glass and read the small print. Here’s what I found. Mr. Krishna, at a special meeting with the Indian media at the Taj Samudra Hotel, is reported to have said something about ‘the key question of political settlement for the island’s Tamil community’. He is said to have reiterated the words of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh ‘meaningful devolution’. On Saturday, at a ceremony to open a consulate in Jaffna, the man had said ‘a devolution package should be worked out, based on the 13th Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution’ (which, according to Bodhi was thrust down the throats of the Sri Lankan polity by Rajiv Gandhi, then Indian Prime Minister, using J.R.Jayewardene’s twisted arm).
Since I am not an expert, I took out my political magnifying glass and read the small print. Here’s what I found. Mr. Krishna, at a special meeting with the Indian media at the Taj Samudra Hotel, is reported to have said something about ‘the key question of political settlement for the island’s Tamil community’. He is said to have reiterated the words of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh ‘meaningful devolution’. On Saturday, at a ceremony to open a consulate in Jaffna, the man had said ‘a devolution package should be worked out, based on the 13th Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution’ (which, according to Bodhi was thrust down the throats of the Sri Lankan polity by Rajiv Gandhi, then Indian Prime Minister, using J.R.Jayewardene’s twisted arm).
Should? Did he say ‘should’? ‘Bodhi!’ I shouted. He asked, not amused, ‘what now?’ I apologized for disturbing and asked ‘is is possible that the person who penned this report, one Satarupa Bhattachariya, could have got it wrong; that it was the Pakistani President and not the Indian External Minister who used this un-diplomatic, arrogant and interfering language?’ ‘Not possible,’ the tone was that of a bored human being.
I went back to the drawing board. According to
‘It is about this Tamil problem. This
‘No. He can’t be. First of all, 53% of Tamils live outside the North and East. Secondly, history and archaeology sit squarely against the exclusive Tamil homeland thesis. Thirdly, devolution does not make any economic sense and if taken to its logical conclusion will result in the
‘Sure it is not the Pakistani President? Maybe the reporter got the name wrong?’ I persisted.
‘Are you dumb? For there to be a solution there has to be a problem. If there is a problem it has to be articulated not with reference to myth and legend but claims that can be substantiated and realities. You develop solutions on realities, not fictions. The 13th Amendment was a monstrosity that was built on a monumental fiction. That’s the kind of thing that arrogance and ignorance produce.’
‘You mean, something that a country like
‘No, you fool,
He stormed off. I
sank deep into meditation. Much edified.
0 comments:
Post a Comment