Some would say that the second cricket test between
‘What ifs’ make for interesting fantasies. We can’t really tell what directions things
could have gone if this and not that was done. Cricket is entertaining (or can
be) but it is not theatre and the players, umpires, commentators, selectors,
managers, reserves, spectators, scribes and others are not there to recite
lines and move hither and thither according to some ‘by-hearted’ script. Yes,
there’s match-fixing, but I like to think that not everything is ‘fixed’. Things like the Dil-Scoop give me hope.
The pitch of course can account for much of the story, given
the human resources on show. On the
other hand, crazy things can happen if one seizes the half-chances that come
one’s way. I was reading a short while
ago, for example, how in 1983 Surrey was bundled out for 14 runs by Essex . Neil Foster
and Norbert Phillip had ripped through the batting and players had to be
dragged out of their end-of-the-day showers to go bat. Sylvester Clarke, it is
said, had gone out to the middle without any socks and with soap all over his
head. There was an element of luck of
course, but confidence, fading light, a pitch that all of a sudden was swing
and seam friendly and of course rank bad batting combined to give an unexpected
twist to the day’s story.
There was a what-if in the Second Test between Sri Lanka and India in 2010. It happened in the 66th over of India ’s first
innings. The second ball. Dilhara Fernando bounced outside the off and
Sachin Tendulkar tried to upper cut it and nicked it. Prasanna Jayawardena, the best keeper in test
cricket, couldn’t hold on to it. By the
time Prasanna held on to Tendulkar’s second nick (this time off Dilshan), the
maestro had progressed to 203 and India had added 367 runs more. India was
finally bowled out for 707, 65 ahead of what had at one point appeared to be a
match-winning Sri Lankan total (642 for 4).
Theoretically, India could have still reached 700
had Tendulkar been dismissed for 29.
Theoretically India
might have collapsed for less than 300.
We can never tell. This is why you
are expected to hang on to the once-in-50-overs half-chance that might come
your way, especially if it’s a batting track and if you don’t have someone like
Muttiah Muralitharan (who could turn the ball even on a tarred road) on your
side.
This is not a cricket story. It is the story of anyone and
everyone against whom the odds are stacked, by dint of circumstance or resource
endowment or anything else. This side of
breaking rules/laws (that’s possible too) and this side of not being guided by
ethical concerns, what this means is vigilance, determination, stamina and a
minimum degree of faith in the laws of nature or in the very least the
opposition being prone to error on account of being humanly frail.
Tendulkar is the world’s greatest batsman, but he does get
out. He has played in 168 tests and come to the crease 274 times. He’s been dismissed a total of 245
times. Not infallible. He averages over 50 runs per at-bat, true,
but he’s been dismissed for small scores.
His record shows that he’s consistent and dangerous. One cannot afford to give such a formidable
opponent a second chance.
So if you think the odds are against you, take heart. Your chances are rarely at ‘zero’. There’s always a slim chance. That could make a difference. It requires you to be alert though. The game-changing moment may come in the next
second or the next decade; what’s important to remember is that it could arrive
the next moment. Given odds, it is better
not to take your eye away for what this might mean is a life time of
meaningless fantasizing about the ‘what if’ moment that was not.
All this subject of course to the caveat pregnant in the
question, ‘is it worth it?’ There’s a
Sachin Tendulkar out there who might nick it your way. Are you ready?
1 comments:
there is all and different 'facets of life' in cricket.
little 'kalu' (Romesh kaluwitharana) is my favorite how about you Sir Tony Grieg :) the world knows who wanted to sit on the pavilion with out giving commentaries when the pair ( little Kalu and Master Blaster)was playing?
good to analyze life in cricket after a long time.
Post a Comment