This is a re-post of a kind. I've added pics from 2014 to this piece, written in 2013.
We live in an era of ‘flexible capital’. Money moves, industries move, people move. Things are supposed to move around and fit together in locations that make for best returns. Theoretically. Typically of course capital moves to resource rich places where resource-extraction is cost-effective and where no-sweat of less-sweat extraction of labor power is possible.
Companies are like that. They are made of hire-and-fire. They are made of people who have left poorer contracts and are looking out for better ones. Newspaper offices are no different. There was a time when people stayed, grew into and with editorial offices. That was way back when.
The pic in the center was taken for an article on Vesak commercialization. Ironic, considering it was Thushara's work! |
Then again there are those who for many reasons are not
favorably ‘optioned’. ‘The Nation’ will
celebrate seven years a few days from now.
‘The Nation’ has changed hands, changed direction and focus, thanks to
those who were or are part of it. Of
those who joined at the start way back in 2006, only 5 remain. That’s how
newspapers are. People come, people
go. It is not a phenomenon peculiar to
‘The Nation’. Some arrivals help, some
don’t. Some departures cost, some do
not. Anyway, of these 5, only one, a
photojournalist, belongs to the Editorial Staff. Among the other three is Sundara Arachchige
Don Ananda Thushara, officially an ‘Office Assistant’.
At it again, a year later |
The word ‘assistant’ does a lot of injustice to
Thushara. Everyone ‘assists’ – that’s
how any product comes out of a production process. ‘Assistant’ has connotations of ‘adjunct’, an
add-on and even an entity that is not ‘central’ to the main functions of an
office. That’s so wrong.
Thushara is a Jack-of-Many-Trades and Master-of-Several. He makes tea like no one does. There are people who do not drink tea on Thushara’s off-days. He cuts birthday cakes, farewell-cakes and first-salary-cakes perfectly, i.e. so everyone present gets an equal share.
He is a self-taught type-setter. He is a self-taught archivist. He alone knows where to find what in issues
from several years ago. He is that
meticulous. He has a sense for space,
furniture and anthropometrics and that’s part of the reason why the contraction
of editorial space hasn’t cramped anyone.
He alone knows about the ins and out of the entire staff,
keeping track of who has taken how much leave.
Indeed, the leave-takers themselves would not know where they stand in
relation to that point beyond which the HR Department raps them on their
knuckles. Ask him about freelance payments and he will tell you who gets paid
how much and what the relevant costs were for each section of The Nation in the
month of April. Come March-April when
people apply for Journalism Awards, it is Thushara who will have the glue and the
scissors, find the relevant articles from the archives, photocopy the same and
put it all together neatly in presentable form.
You can trust Thushara to collect anything from and deliver anything to any destination, any office or any individual. Thushara knows things. A lot of things.
Come Christmas time, and the entire place is full of
decorations. Happens overnight. Where the material was obtained from, whether
there were costs involved and if so who paid the bills – no one knows. Is it because he’s a Catholic? No.
It’s not a has-to-be-done thing but it’s something that’s nice. The Nation has its share of Christians. They did not think of decorating the place
and neither did they ask Thushara to do it. It’s not part of his JD, anyway
(like most things he does).
Thushara is
an expert at getting such things done.
So this is Vesak. Nothing to do
with his faith and not his festival. The Buddhists in ‘The Nation’ didn’t think
of decorating the office. No one told Thushara to make Vesak Koodu. Not part of his
JD. But he does such things. Makes
things look nice. Adds color. Makes people smile. Perhaps that’s the expression of ‘Christian
Charity’ that he has internalized.
Perhaps it’s just him. A nice
man. A make-everyone-happy man, an always-with-a-smile man. Or perhaps he owns ‘The Nation’ and because
he belongs to ‘The Nation’ in ways that no one else does.
1 comments:
This is a sensitive and delightful piece.
Post a Comment