A random channel-switch on Saturday morning as I drove to work took me to a station running a documentary on Joe Abeywickrama, regarded as one of the greatest actors of his time if not the greatest. It was Joe’s second death anniversary, I learned. The narrative cut to old interviews with Joe as well as dialogues from the films he has acted in. What remained with me was the first line I heard. Here’s a rough translation.
‘Actors are expected
to be handsome, athletic able to move feet to music and twist themselves around
trees in dance sequences. Joe Abeywickrama, clearly un-endowed, nevertheless made
these criteria meaningless; he made his mark, he left an indelible legacy.’
Joe was not handsome.
He was no athlete. And yet, he drew from everyone he had ever
encountered, all the voices he had heard, every nuance of expression on all the
faces had seen. He was not handsome. He
was beautiful, nevertheless, and that’s why two years ago, watching students of
the Sinhala Literary Association of Ladies’ College enact bits and pieces of
Joe’s life by way of tribute, tears came to my eyes.
This, however, is not about Joe. It is about ‘beauty’. It is as inspired as much by what I heard on
Saturday morning as by an interesting interview of Nandita Das in ‘Civil
Society Online’, where the actress responds to questions following her signing
the ‘Black is beautiful – beauty beyond color’ petition.
A poster with Nandita’s face on it has since gone viral on social
media and attracted widespread attention to the campaign started by the
Chennai-based network Women of Worth (WoW) to fight “the toxic belief that a
woman’s worth is measured by the fairness of her skin”.
Nandita is described as ‘dark and dusky’, fairer actresses
are not tagged ‘fair’. It is as though fair equals beautiful to the point that
less-than-fair has to be un-toned with alluring descriptive.
Just the other day, a woman of Indian heritage being
adjudged Miss America spawned a slew of racist tweets from across the USA. Tunku Varadarajan posted a wry comment on the
issue in ‘The Daily Beast’ pointing out that in India Miss America, Nina
Davuluri, would be considered ‘too dark to succeed’.
Nandita, in the interview, tells us that the obsessions with
fair skin is not unrelated to concerted campaigns by the cosmetic industry to
market ‘whitening’ products.
‘The cosmetics business thrives because the aspirations
exist. The two feed off each other. All the beauty magazines are designed to
make you feel ugly and want to change your features and skin color. During my
field work in Orissa’s Kandhamal district, when it was called Phulbani, I went
to areas where there was no electricity and people did not even have food to
eat, and I saw women using fairness creams that were well past their expiry
date. These had obviously been dumped here. So this obsession with fairness
cuts across class. The cosmetics companies only capitalize on it.’
It pays for women and men to think they are ugly or
inadequate. Money is spent to implant
such notions in the minds of people, especially women. But let’s think about beautiful and
ugly. We learn and internalize notions
of beauty. And so, when we see someone
(or ourselves in the mirror), we think ‘beautiful’ or ‘ugly’ or something
between the two, consciously or unconsciously.
Now think of the people we admired most, the people who touched our
lives and who inspire us most. Check if
they are beautiful as per popular notions.
The truth is that faces disappear the more we get to know their owners.
We stop seeing skin tone and complexion; hearts and minds surface and hide all
such markers of beauty (or ugliness) as have been defined for us, sooner or
later.
There were two women who I considered ‘the most beautiful’
in my life, growing up; my mother and grandmother. My mother passed away at the age of 72, my
grandmother at the age of 91. They grew older as I grew up, but they remained
beautiful. I remember most how they
looked in the last days they spent on this earth. One word. Beautiful. My wife looks nothing like she did when I
first met her, 21 years ago. She is no
less beautiful. My daughters are 12 and 10 and the are beautiful. None of these 5 females used or use
make-up.
John Keats wrote, ‘Beauty is truth, truth beauty’. Maybe.
I would add, ‘love is beauty-maker’, ‘knowing is beauty-giver’. Love and wisdom are the best cosmetics,
because not only do they color us differently but enable us to draw out the
full color-range of all that our gaze caress, human being included.
We cannot expect profit-seeking cosmetic peddlers not to
bombard us with beauty-definition and ‘ugliness’-removers. We can protect our
eyes, though. We can choose not to have our hearts polluted by advertisement
and the politics of beauty-defining. We
can love. And there’s nothing more
beautiful than that. I don’t know about
Nandita, but on screen there’s no one who touched me, spoke to me and educated
me about the human condition than Joe Abeywickrama. Joe made scriptwriter look beautiful and that
and not his face is what is most endearing and beautiful about the man.
[You can communicate with Malinda Seneviratne via msenevira@gmail.com]
1 comments:
Who else but one with the most beautiful heart could have written this?
Post a Comment