www.matthewwilliamsellis.photoshelter.com |
We need to name things because we
don’t live alone, we live among people, at home and away, in work places and
wherever and whenever we commerce with one another. There are things we can communicate with
words, for example disapproval, gratitude and love can make do with glance, slight
movement of head in a particular manner, the raised finger, the wave of hand or
expressions that are as unambiguous as ‘stop’, ‘no’, ‘it’s ok’, ‘thank you’ or
‘I am not impressed’. In the main,
though, we are a word-species.
We are not word-free even if we
wanted to be. Words jump out at us from
newsprint and television screen. They waft from car radio and iPod. They beep into our lives as text messages.
They travel from ear to ear, mouth to mouth over telephone and Skype. They are
inboxed and tweeted. They come as
routine greeting, as office memo and minute, and weighing down or elevating
conversation.
Words are useful, that much is
certain. We can’t do without them,
that’s true. But how much of it is
necessary? How little is enough? When do we decide that the next thing to roll
out of tongue and mouth is the word-straw that breaks the camel-back of
usefulness, for recipient and self?
Words are to a journalist or
writer what toolkit is to mechanic, so we cannot avoid them. On the other hand, even those for whom words
and communication are akin to brick and mortar have time and opportunity for
wordlessness. One assumes that when
words are but peripheral tools in certain vocations, those engaged have more
wordless moments available to them.
Either way, there must be moments, random perhaps, when one can ponder
on words and their limited utility.
Silence. Now that’s something we
don’t think about often. If there was no
silence, there would be no words, for letter will merge with letter, word
entangle with word, and our worlds will quickly spin into a jumble we cannot
extricate word from, draw meaning from or separate sanity from insanity.
Let us consider an example. We see during election campaigns candidates
taking out newspaper advertisements.
There are full page ads which mention each and every ‘service’ that the
particular candidate has delivered, all acts of charity and goodwill, all his
or her qualification, papered and otherwise, that make him or her THE person to
vote for. In a word, clutter. We hear least when there is too much to
hear. Then there are smaller ads. Quarter page spaces on which with minimal
fuss a candidate writes a short capture-all.
You will see it. Hear him or
her.
What we see around us, wouldn’t
you agree, is a massive canvass crisscrossed with words, phrases, sentences and
questions, with paragraphs beginning before the previous one ends, chapters
bleeding into one another, a massive archive where pages of books have been
torn and inserted in other books and misplaced manuscripts scatter the many
isles making even tiptoeing difficult?
What if 50% of the words ‘decreed’
for tomorrow are sucked out of the system?
Would we be poorer, would we collapse in incapacitation, would we go
hungry to bed for lack of word-nutrient?
There are so many words, so many books and too many reviews too. We have so little time and we spend too much
time figuring out reading priorities.
Perhaps it would become easy if we
inserted some whiteness into it all. If
we interjected space between words, if we used punctuation, we might read
better. If we sprayed upon the word-wall
the graffiti of silence, message might become clearer.
It is like light. Too much of it turns it into a polluting
substance because it is excessive, misdirected and obtrusive. It trespasses. Turn the lights off or walk along a lightless
pathway and your ears and nostrils turn into eyes. Give word a rest and silence tells you
fascinating stories. And they come
accompanied with music and mystery, they delight and are no less illuminating.
msenevira@gmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment