There is a lot of irony in the Government mulling the
setting up of a Truth Commission on the lines of the model adopted by
post-apartheid South Africa just days after the Chairman of the Lessons Learnt
and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), former Attorney General C.R. De Silva
passed away.
The LLRC was maligned even before it began sittings by many
who were virulently opposed to the Government.
Its independence was questioned, its mandate found fault with and the
value of conclusions pre-judged. Ironically, these very same objectors praised
the LLRC report and, true to form, castigated the Government for not
implementing recommendations therein.
The objectors turned cheer-leaders, naturally, indulged in a
pick-and-choose exercise that amounted to an affront to the Commission and the
tireless and thankless work it did.
Part of the irony is Bishop Desmond Tutu’s involvement in
the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of South Africa. Tutu has uttered unadulterated nonsense on
Sri Lanka, regurgitating fabrications circulated by the LTTE. That said, the TRC is still worthy of
visitation by a nation facing multiple post-conflict challenges, including the
unfair and pernicious attacks by outside forces that cannot stomach the fact
that their outcome preferences did not materialize.
The LLRC is said to have exceeded mandate, but few if any
will claim that C.R. De Silva and his fellow commissioners were moved by
anything but good intention. The
proposed Commission must not only complement the LLRC but be teethed in a
manner that makes implementation of recommendation a non-negotiable outcome.
Critics will no doubt scoff at this move, citing the
numerous commissions that have been appointed whose reports and recommendations
gather dust to this day. They will also
question the independence of such commissions.
Such commissions can only be appointed by the President, after all, and
any forum set up to tackle issues pertaining to the conflict will have to
contend with allegations of human rights violations which, as we know, include
accusations of direct or indirect involvement by the Government. Wild and politically motivated though these
allegations are, with little evidence to warrant finger-pointing, they have
acquired, as designed, lives of their own.
That’s a political reality that the Government has to contend with.
The only way that questions over independence can be met
would be for President Mahinda Rajapaksa to solicit recommendations of
modalities as well as composition from people conversant on the subject of
justice who are also widely (locally and internationally) recognized for their
impeccable integrity. Sources close to
the President indicate that the views of people such as Justice Weeramantry
will be solicited.
While a document leaked to and published by Wikileaks
clearly indicate that even the ICRC (which had a ‘presence’ in the conflict
area right until the end) was convinced that there was no ‘policy’ of killing
civilians and as such clearly absolves the central command of all operations
(headed by the President and the Secretary of Defence) of any wrongdoing,
wrongdoing there probably was as in the case of all conflicts. In Sri Lanka, what was seen was a massive
hostage rescue operation, indeed the biggest the world has ever known. It is unthinkable that innocent lives were
not lost. It is also unthinkable that
there were no errant soldiers who fought out-of-line, so to speak.
Cynics will pooh-pooh this move by the President, claiming
that it is eye-wash timed to placate those who might give the Government a hard
time during the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) which begins
next week. The onus then is on the
President to prove them wrong. The only
way he can do this is to ‘fix’ modalities, mandates and composition by acting
strictly on the recommendations of people like Justice Weeramantry.
All it will take is a single phone call followed by a public
statement indicating directions and naming persons relevant to the
exercise.
Not least of all, it would be fitting tribute to the late
C.R. De Silva and the exhausting work he presided over.
msenevira@gmail.com
1 comments:
Its a fight of David against Goliath!
All these politically motivated and ill informed individuals,Extremists, religious fanatics,racists, can they speak up about their own countries and say "Our hands our not stained" ! "We have never been at war, we are honest,there have never been crime in our countries!, no kick backs! no religious disputes ? well the answeres are obvious!
Post a Comment