For years, UNP Parliamentarian Dr Harsha De Silva has regularly claimed that statistics pertaining to the country’s economic and social wellbeing have been doctored. These claims have usually been accompanied by warnings of imminent economic collapse. The economy has not collapsed as predicted and explanations have been thin on logic. This does not mean, however, that the allegations of statistics-doctoring are figments of De Silva’s imagination.
The recent claim by a Director attached to the Accounts
Division of the Department of Census and Statistics to the effect that he was
asked by the Deputy Director General to change the economic growth rate
calculated by the Division (from 5.4% to 6.0%) has shocked one and all. He alleges that this was a directive of the
Director General.
The Director General has countered that the said Director
had not followed standard procedure. The
Director, since transferred out of the Department, now faces a disciplinary
inquiry. The Department, to be fair, has
on occasion come up with less than cheerful outlooks based on data
gathered. On the other hand, in this
instance, a manifest reluctance to explain discrepancy does raise questions
about integrity. The said Director, it
must be remembered, is a veteran statistician with 30 years of experience in
the Department, and if he is inept, as claimed, that itself is a slur on the
institution.
If indeed the Director General has insisted on the doctoring
of conclusions it is a serious matter.
Preferred outcomes can be generated by clever number-cooking, but that
amounts to a breach of public trust. It
moreover implicates top officials in both the Treasury and the Central Bank,
for it is hard to believe that the head of this department would dare mislead
say the Governor of the Central Bank and the Treasury Secretary.
The matter could easily be cleared if methodologies are
revealed and the public be asked to deliberate on which was more robust and
consequently which conclusions to believe.
The Director’s statement to the investigating officer can easily be
perused by experts who can then rule on his judgment. The same could be done for the ‘official
version’, if the Department cooperates.
As things stand, the onus is on the Department to reveal all, if it is
to get rid of the shadow that has fallen on it.
Upping the number from 5.4 to 6.0, when considering what
they numbers represent, translates into a lot of money. In the current global economic climate,
however, a 5.4% growth rate is nothing to be ashamed of, even if it is falls
short of government prediction. If it
was say 3.2% it would be alarming and compromise the credibility of those who
make such predictions. If anyone gets
alarmed or doesn’t have the intellectual ability to explain difference between
prediction and outcome, whether it be big or small, it points to a multiple
ailments including arrogance, irresponsibility, lack of professionalism and
absence of integrity.
Sunshine stories are not the preserve of spineless public
servants (and we are not passing judgment on the Department of Census and
Statistics, yet). They are what lackeys
typically regale their masters with.
Some say that this is the inevitable curse of those who lead. The problem with sunshine stories is that
while they are nice to read, their veracity gets tested in the matter of
living, the humble but necessary acts of buying stationary for children,
purchasing medicine and securing money to bury or cremate the dead. Budgets have to be balanced, in the final
instance, at home. That’s the bottom
line of all economic theory. The term
‘economy,’ after all is derived from the Greek word for household, oikos.
A responsible and indeed a shrewd government will understand
that all things considered truth sells better and more importantly is easier to
defend than a lie. And it’s not only
about growth rates. An analogy can be
obtained from the operations conducted to rid the country of the terrorist
menace. For years successive governments
lied. In the last three years of the
conflict, however, part of the reason why the Government secured the support of
the general public was because the fact that ‘must do things’ come with
‘probably costs’ was expressly stated.
We don’t need fairy tales. We don’t need the truth to be
varnished. The truth, rather, will empower
both the ruled and the ruler in the long run.
msenevira@gmail.com
3 comments:
Will the "investigations" find out who ordered the poor director general to doctor the figures? Apparently director general has nothing to gain by doctoring the accounts unless a crooked politician who has a life habit of cheating people ordes to do so from a top seat. It would be a National service if this could be found out, though most of us can smell the rat by intuition.
Very balanced comment. Thank you, Malinda.
There an Arjunan Sivanathan as well who was talking up economic and currency collapse.
Turned out he also wanted "Sri Lanka must be subject to a regime of punitive economic sanctions if it fails to heed our calls for an independent international inquiry into war crimes. "
I guess hook or by crook.
http://sbarrkum.blogspot.com/2012/02/does-arujuna-sivananthan-have-axe-to.html
Post a Comment