'Buttlering' gives a batsman an edge of a couple of yards while a bowler who errs by a fraction of an inch is no-balled. |
These days batsmen who get out don’t always walk back to the
pavilion. No, I am not talking about
batsmen who having snicked a ball to the keeper pretending they have not,
hoping that the umpire would have missed it.
The rules have changed and sometimes the umpires ‘go upstairs’ to see if
the delivery was legit. They let the cameras decide if the bowler has
overstepped and therefore delivered a ‘no ball’, in which case the batsman
stays.
What this means is that a fraction of an inch is all it
takes for a wicket taking delivery to be penalized with a run to the
opposition. It’s all good. There’s a popping crease marked on the wicket
for a reason.
Still, it appears that the laws and traditions are very
strict for the bowler but go easy on the batsmen and nothing shows this up
better than what might be called ‘Buttlering’.
During the 5th ODI between England and Sri Lanka Jos
Buttler, the English batsman was declared out after Sri Lankan spinner Sachitra
Senanayake ‘Mankaaded’ him; i.e. whipped the bails off at the non-striker’s end
before he got into his delivery stride after finding Buttler out of the
crease. Ravi Bopara, with whom Buttler
put together a partnership that almost brought England a victory in the 4th
ODI said ‘it was the done thing’. The ‘done
thing’, let’s call it ‘Buttlering’ turned some twenty plus singles into ‘twos’
in that 4th ODI. ‘Buttlering’
did not go unnoticed. Warnings were issued.
Buttlering in the 5th ODI prompted further warnings and was
put to a stop by Sachitra ‘Mankaading’ Jos.
Now since batsmen often get ‘run out by a whisker’, an
advantage of even an inch or two can make a massive difference. While a fraction ‘off’ can deny a bowler a
wicket because it would be called a ‘no ball’, a fraction ‘extra’ secures safety
for a batsman. In the former case, the
bowler is penalized and in the latter the batsman is rewarded. Is this cricket, as the saying goes? Sadly,
it is.
That’s a batsman vs bowler affair. But there’s inconsistency for batsmen
too. If a lead of a few feet at the
beginning of a run is fair (i.e. ‘the done thing’), why should a few inches
short in the event of a batsman not touching the crease when turning for a
second run be called ‘one short’ by the umpire?
The umpire is alert to where the bowler’s foot lands when he
delivers. That’s part of his job. The umpire is not required to check if the non-striker
is behind the crease (i.e. either a foot or the grounded bat) at the same
moment. It can’t be too difficult to
write something into the law to deter Buttlering, which is nothing but blatant
gamesmanship and a deliberate abuse of a lacuna in the law. The umpire can take note and if a single (or
two or three) is taken, declare ‘one short’.
As things stand, however, the bowler gets shortchanged while
the batsman has the opportunity to steal a few coins. They add up, as the 4th ODI
clearly showed. If Buttlering is
sanctioned then checking for no-balls after a wicket is taken must be done away
with. Indeed, if the transgression is
similar (in length) to done-thing-length or Buttler-Length, then no-ball should
not be called. If someone really wants clarity,
consistency and hard line rules, then an adjustment should be made to the
length of the track, say 24 yards instead of 22. Don’t like it? Well then, let’s not treat Buttlering in
international cricket as though it was something that happens in the village
greens where coconut tree is a fielder and a ‘six’ into the grumpy neighbor’s
garden is ‘out’.
Technology has invaded cricket. Rules have been fine-tuned. Players are required to show greater degrees
of professionalism. Buttlerism persists
though and is played down and even applauded by fellow cheats like Ravi Bopara
while Mankaading is booed.
Something is wrong here and the ICC must do what’s necessary
to correct it.
P.S. For an analogy in politics please read 'Doing the done thing'
P.S. For an analogy in politics please read 'Doing the done thing'
0 comments:
Post a Comment