I was thinking of dogs and
remembered an observation attributed to the irrepressible Ranbanda Seneviratne:
‘There was a time when if a dog died, there would be 50 people there
immediately wondering whose dog it was, how it died and what needs to be done;
now, if 50 people died, not a dog would be bothered.’ I believe this comment was made in those
terrible UNP-JVP ‘bheeshanaya’ days
at the end of the 1980s. I don’t think
that his lawyer-lyricist meant any disrespect for dogs. A dog, after all, is ‘man’s best
friend’.
People love dogs, they pamper them
and some cultures even worship them (some eat them, but that’s another story). I don’t understand how some people can get
all weepy when hearing of or seeing a dog in distress but are quite oblivious
to a lot of nasty things that people do to other people, much of which is quite
in-your-face when you come to think of it.
I suppose people have preferences and some prefer dogs to human
beings. As for me, I am no dog-lover but this doesn’t
mean I am given to kicking or throwing stones at them.
My dog-day began last evening when
I heard a dog-story. The dog concerned
just had its first birthday. Well, this
is the first time I heard a dog having a birthday and one which was actually
celebrated, but then again I am acutely aware that the universe of my ignorance
is infinite. Let me call the dog ‘Jo’
and get on with the story.
Jo, a Portuguese Water Dog (I never
knew that such a breed existed but again, I am no dog-lover), had a birthday
bash. I mean, Jo’s owners/family (some dog-lovers are sensitive about these
distinctions, I know) celebrated the little guy’s birthday by throwing a party.
Jo got a unique birthday gift: a
doghouse. Not that Jo was homeless
before, of course. Jo already had a home.
And a family. And was a celebrity in his own right.
What was remarkable about this
gift is that the doghouse was edible.
‘Cute’ and ‘sweet’ are the exclamations that dog-lovers would respond
with, I believe. Jo’s doghouse was made
of veal.
I checked ‘veal’ in the food
dictionary and found that there’s more to ‘veal’ than ‘baby-calf’. The following is an extract:
Though there are no precise age standards for veal, the term is generally used to describe a young calf from 1 to 3 months old. ‘Milk-fed veal’ comes from calves up to 12 weeks old who have not been weaned from their mother's milk. Their delicately textured flesh is firm and creamy white with a pale grayish-pink tinge. ‘Formula-fed veal’ can come from calves up to about 4 months old, fed a special diet of milk solids, fats, various nutrients and water; it is not as rich or delicate because there’s no milk-fat in the diet. ‘Bob veal’ refers to calves younger than 1 month old. Their pale, shell-pink flesh is quite bland and the texture is soft. In all true veal, the animals haven't been allowed to eat grains or grasses, either of which would cause the flesh to darken. Calves between 6 and 12 months old are called ‘baby beef’, and have flesh that's coarser, stronger-flavored and from pink to light red in color. The USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) grades veal in six different categories; from highest to lowest they are Prime, Choice, Good, Standard, Utility and Cull. The last three grades are rarely sold in retail outlets. When choosing veal, let color be your guide. The flesh should be creamy white — barely tinged with grayish-pink — and the fat white. Meat that's pink turning red means the so-called "veal" is older than it should be. Veal's texture should be firm, finely grained and smooth.
I
was stunned by my ignorance. I am not
what kind of veal Jo’s ‘doghouse’ was made of, but at this point it does not
matter. It’s just a calf. A baby. Even younger than Jo. Some would say ‘extravagant’ given that veal
is expensive, but then again if it’s available and is affordable to ‘the
family’, one can’t find fault with the amount of money spent. That a lot of people in this world are starving
is beside the point. We can’t ourselves starve because others are and/or we
can’t feed them all.
Jo
didn’t have a choice. Jo didn’t ask for veal and probably didn’t know where his
‘doghouse’ came from, and nothing of course of the process from the womb of a
cow to the ‘family garden’ or wherever the birthday party was held. The ‘family’ knew, though. The family didn’t
really care.
I
know of course that different cultures have different tastes and food
preferences, even in this globalized world we live in. Some kill and consumer because there is no
other way to survive. Some kill for
sport. Some kill and consume even when
there are a million other forms of food available, different in taste perhaps
but equally nutritious. Who am I to
impose on another culture the key defining values of my culture? Who am I to say that the life of a fellow
creature is as precious as that of a fellow human being? Who am I to tell Jo what he should or should
not eat? But are talking about a calf
and one that may have not been weaned from its mother’s milk. It shook me up and all the relativist and
arguments that reference the culture-specific aspect of food preference could
not console me.
If
we forget for a moment the relative character of the value we assign to various
species, if we assume that all creatures, sharing our will to live and fear of
death, have an equal right to live on this earth (which does not belong to our
species, although we do a lot of buying, selling and killing over it), then we
could think along the following (brutal) lines.
A
human mother gives birth to an infant.
That infant is separated from her mother and put on a special diet for a
few weeks. The infant is then
slaughtered and her body parts displayed in a supermarket, neatly packed in a
freezer. A few hours later, a lion walks
in, looking for an appropriate gift for its cub, who is going to celebrate a
birthday. The lion picks up the ‘tender’
meat (say, a couple of kilos), goes home, makes a ‘cave’ out of it and offers
it to the cub saying in lion-lingo, ‘happy birthday son’.
Gross? Yes.
Need I say more?
*This was first published exactly 5 years ago in the 'Daily News', to which paper I wrote a daily column titled 'The Morning Inspection'
Malinda Seneviratne is
the Editor-in-Chief of 'The Nation' and can be reached at msenevira@gmail.com
2 comments:
I quite appreciate this beautifully written, thought-provoking essay of Malinda that depicts varying aspects of quick human thinking and behaviour without giving much thought to where it all might end up. Isn't this sheer human ignorance what is described as ' Avijja' ?
I quite appreciate this beautifully written, thought-provoking essay of Malinda that depicts varying aspects of quick human thinking and behaviour without giving much thought to where it all might end up. Isn’t this sheer ignorance what is described as ‘ Avijja’ ?
Post a Comment