Of all that is pernicious in all resolutions tabled in the
UNHRC against Sri Lanka the most scandalous and disgusting perhaps is limiting
investigations calls for to the last few months of the war. We are talking about a conflict that dragged
for almost three decades. We are talking
about a couple of hundred thousand killed.
One life cannot be less valuable than another. One murder cannot be more despicable than
another. The grief of one mother cannot
be less than that of another mother. The
same goes for fathers, children, lovers and friends who grieve.
We are reminded of this monstrous ‘logic’ today when there’s
a call for the Mahinda Rajapaksa regime and wrongdoers therein being held
responsible for wrongdoing; a call for a full investigation on numerous
allegations. Now, as someone said
‘compassion’ (maithree) is all good
but this does not mean that wrongdoing
and wrongdoers should go uninvestigated and unpunished
respectively. Strangely, though,
Champika Ranawaka of the Jathika Hela Urumaya who spearheaded Maithripala
Sirisena’s campaign and was clearly the most articulate critique of the regime
on all counts including corruption has picked a period, 2004-2014. This is arbitrary and worse it smacks of witch-hunting.
True, it is the regime that was defeated that is under
scrutiny. True, investigation of
corruption charges was a key theme of the Sirisena campaign and it can be
concluded that people did vote for such an inquiry. Corruption and wrongdoing on the other hand
could not have begun in November 2004.
We are after all talking about a constitution and institutional
arrangement that made for abuse and pilfering in a large scale as well as a
culture of impunity that was well and truly made use of by many who wielded
power for decades but especially since 1977.
Bheeshanaya (terror) and dhooshanaya (corruption) let us not
forget were charges leveled by those in the opposition at least since the 1988
Presidential Election. They had
currency.
Some might claim that the bheeshana-dhooshana levels of the past 10 years were unprecedented,
but they would be those who have short memories considering what happened in
1988-89 and towards the tail end of Chandrika Kumaratunga’s first term (before
her wings were clipped by the Parivasa
arrangement with the JVP, the 17th Amendment and the brief UNP
Government of 2001-2004).
We cannot go to Year Dot.
This is clear. However, since
those who were charged (but not investigated) are still around and since this Government
has come to clean up, so to speak, we should start at least from 1994 which is
when coalitions led by the SLFP first came to power. Most importantly it includes the period
2001-2004 when the UNP held sway. If
there’s going to be change, it must be underlined by wholesomeness, not
revenge-intent.
Today we have a President who is also the Chairman of the
main party of the coalition led by the opponent he defeated. All those who supported ‘the corrupt regime’
have now pledged allegiance to President Maithripala Sirisena. He has as his key coalition partner, the
United National Party, which too is not exactly a party of saints. One of his key backers was ex President Chandrika
Kumaratunge, a person described as Chaura
Regina (The Thieving Queen).
It is good to clean up.
It is necessary to investigate.
It is non-negotiable that the constitution and institutional arrangement
be reformed so that corruption can be stumped.
Mark it with ‘vengeance’ and we can shed all illusions about this regime
being ‘better’ (forget ‘compassionate’).
Bring to book the crooks of the previous regime by all means, but let
other crooks go free and you would be doing a great disservice to those who
voted for ‘change’.
1 comments:
Of course I too suggested the same. Any criminal offence can be investigated within 20 years . These investigations can't be selective! Start from 1994, up to date..
Post a Comment