It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Sri
Lanka. It was not exactly what the
petitioners wanted, but even the ‘compromise’ contained in the determination to
force the tobacco industry to have pictorial warnings about the possible
ill-effects of smoking was a considerable victory.
As has been the case in all parts of the world where people
have lobbied against the smoking, the tobacco industry fought tooth and nail to
trump its ‘detractors’. This was to be
expected. Anyway, the anti-tobacco lobby
has reason to celebrate. They cannot
rest, however.
The tobacco industry argues (and they do have a point) that
these moves will encourage smokers to pick cheaper and even more harmful
tobacco products. It is up to the
relevant authorities then to allay such ‘good-hearted concerns of the tobacco
industry’. However, with respect to this
particular judgment which came into force on January 1, 2015, there are still
areas which need to be looked at.
First and foremost, it must be recognized that the 50-60%
agreement (i.e. the surface that should carry the warnings) is a compromise and
therefore must be treated as an interim ‘solution’ not least of all because the
tobacco industry will ‘err’ towards 50 and not 60. Secondly, there’s the vexed issue of loose
cigarettes.
Most smokers in Sri Lanka, especially those in lower income
categories purchase loose cigarettes.
They just can’t afford to buy the ‘beautifully decorated’ packets. So they miss out on the ‘beauty’. They don’t get to see the warnings; there are
no warnings on the cigarettes, after all.
If any law or regulation has an objective and if this
includes education of the consumer so that he/she makes informed choices, well
then those who purchase loose cigarettes will remain uninformed. Do the good-hearted people in the tobacco
industry have a plan to educate these consumers of their products? Are health authorities similarly
concerned?
It is estimated that 60-70% of all sales are from loose
cigarettes. That’s a big chunk and one
which remains untouched by this particular determination. It is perhaps time for Sri Lanka, like India,
to consider banning the sale of loose cigarettes. The Union Health Ministry of India has
accepted a proposal to prohibit the sale of loose cigarettes. An expert panel advising the Ministry has
also recommended that fines for violating rules pertaining to pictorial
warnings be upped. India is
serious. Sadly, Sri Lanka is not.
The
battle against the tobacco industry has only begun, it would seem. Let the authorities get more serious. Let them begin with imposing a ban on the
sale of loose cigarettes. Let us look to
a smoke-free Sri Lanka, sooner rather than later.
1 comments:
A small victory but still a victory. When there was talk about adding these pictures in packets the first thing that came to my mind is the most buy loose cigarettes. I actually thought it would be around 80%, glad to see its around 60-70%.
Banning of selling loose cigarettes is a good idea but as the tobacco companies so kindly points out it could lead to people using other substances so have to thread carefully there too.
Post a Comment