Sometime late last year Maithripala Sirisena effectively
left the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP).
As predicted, he was installed as the leader of the party he ‘left’ the
moment he was elected President. He
became the leader of a party whose entire membership almost campaigned against
him. It certainly didn’t make for ideal
leader-follower relations.
The confusion was exacerbated by the fact that not only did
he appoint the leader of a party with a (relatively) paltry parliamentary
presence as Prime Minister but a cabinet
dominated by that party, the United National Party (UNP). Worse, he has since played a patently
second-fiddle role to Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in affairs of the state.
This naturally made for a jittery minority Government
notwithstanding its much celebrated ‘national’ status with the induction of
some SLFPers into the cabinet. It also
created an ineffective Opposition Leader.
Nimal Siripala Silva’s party leader is (still, even after the 19th
Amendment) the most powerful citizen of the country and yet, it’s ‘the other
guys’ who call the shots; this even though the Opposition Leader has greater
sway in Parliament.
Where could the ‘opposition’ go under these circumstances
except to the camp of the defeated? It
is safe to say that Mahinda Rajapaksa in defeat and under severe attack on all
fronts still has far greater political clout than the Opposition Leader. With talks between the President and his
predecessor not yielding (yet) the desired party unity, it is clear that the
SLFP is on a bad wicket right now.
Mahinda Rajapaksa has very few options. It is natural to demand the maximum and
settle for less. That’s how one should understand him asking to be named as the
SLFP’s Prime Ministerial candidate. On
the other hand, if Sirisena is not interested (and he doesn’t seem to be
either) what is the ‘less’ that he could settle for in a general election?
If he contests on the SLFP ticket he would be just one more
MP. There’s no guarantee that the SLFP
would win. But whether the SLFP wins or
not it remains to be seen what kind of support Mahinda can obtain from the
SLFPers returned by the electorate and how this support compares to Maithripals’s
weight as party leader and Executive President.
If he contests separately and secures a seat then it is unlikely that he
could claim the premiership unless the SLFP and (let’s call it) ‘The Mahinda
Faction’ can together form a government.
Against the ‘Maithripala Factor’ will come into play. There are too many ‘ifs’ in these scenarios. These include the ‘if’ of him wanting to be
just another MP after being the all powerful Executive President.
Perhaps the problem with Mahinda and his backers right now
is that they are trapped in a parliamentary mindset. If they dwell on the fact that Prabhakaran’s
political signature had greater relevance than that of the first four Executive
Presidents in the country (in effect of course) they might consider other
options. Mahinda could remain aloof. He
could offer some supportive statements to the SLFP or be silent. He can wait for the demand to come to
him. With Maithripala playing Elephant
now, playing Lion later and at times operating as though he is just that guy
bringing in drinks for weary players, and with Ranil and the UNP doing what
they’ve always done (minoritarian politics alienating the majority, helping the
filthy rich and playing slave to US interests), demand is most likely to grow
even if attempts are made to trip him with investigation, litigation and
incarceration.
For now, though, it all depends on Maithripala
Sirisena. If he is as blue as the leader
of the SLFP ought to be, then he has to find a way of dealing with the ‘Mahinda
Factor’. Either Mahinda has to be taken
out of the political equation (a tough ask given the (deliberate?) sloth
regarding prosecution on the part of the UNP) or else Maithripala has to find a
way of accommodating him with a larger coalition led by the SLFP. We are in the early days of groups and
personalities fighting for positional advantage and therefore prediction is not
useful.
What can be predicted is that if Maithripala Sirisena cannot
unite the SLFP or if he is not interested in doing so, he is essentially paving
the way for a UNP victory at the next election.
That would make him an indisputable ‘Green’, an UNPer that is. De-facto, if you want to be precise about it. As
things stand, with minimal effort on his part to resolve what could be called
the ‘SLFP’s Mahinda Dilemma’ he is looking more green than blue.
It is simple. If
Sirisena is not doing his utmost to ensure an SLFP victory at the next general
election then he is not fit to be the leader of the party. One would have to conclude that he is playing
into the hands of the UNP, ‘working for the enemy’ as far as the SLFP is
concerned. If that is the case, the
honorable thing would be to state the fact, resign from the party and join the
UNP or else say ‘I am neutral, no longer interested in party politics and will
retire when my term ends’. There’s no
sign of his doing any of the above which leads us to question the man’s
integrity.
7 comments:
Maithripala was propped up by the UNP and other anti MR forces - hence he relies on UNP and those other guys than the SLFP for a large part still view him as a traitor
Better he come a non partisan President rather than an SLFP chairman - but MR given his predilection for Street fighting will surely unseat him using SLFP in Parliament - Hence for his own political survival he has play a devious game of chess
Anyway that's better than having MR and the 18th Amendment and the "non-partisan" newspapermen from the Mars :D
Never mind Maithripala, we wonder what color Malinda Seneviratne is- I suppose his true colors came out when he apologized to Prof. Nesiah having tarnished his reputation.
Shame on you man!
At least i put my name to what i write my friend. It was an out of court settlement due to an error on the part of my lawyers. no regrets. in fact i had apologized the very next week.
What is the point in apologizing when damage is done? How come your allegations suddenly became baseless? because you had no money to pay for defamation??????
What is the point in apologizing when the damage is done? I suppose you withdrew all allegations leveled against him because you were strapped for cash to pay him????
Dear Mr/MS Never-Made-A-Mistake-In-His/Her-Life: read my piece on the subject (it will be out soon). not my fault that some people get the wrong end of the stick. if you read the apology published several years ago you would realize what really happened.
no darling...the apology came YEARS before the court order. the litigant didn't submit THAT apology to court for reasons best known to him. withdrew allegations as per terms of settlement. it went ex parte due to a bungling junior lawyer who incidentally is in cahoots with CPA/NPC types. Go figure!
Post a Comment