Hyperbole
seems to be an essential tool in a politician’s repertoire. ‘Promises’
would constitute another. ‘Politician’ of course is not a term that
could only be used for those aspiring to political office. Even those
who do not contest or do not intend to contest elections can be
political creatures. Indeed, it could even be argued that wherever
choices have to be made, things are political and those who consider
choices, even if they decline one and all, are politicians.
Nevertheless,
we do have degrees of being political. Some just vote. Some offer a
casual opinion and even then rarely. Others are more emotionally
invested. It’s such ‘politicians’ that are relevant here.
So we
see a tendency to use sweeping statements. Molehills are turned into
mountains. And mountains denied existence. Depending on where one’s
sympathies lie, which outcomes one prefers. Typically, those in power
inflate the good and deflate the bad; those out of power play doom’s day
prophet and pooh-pooh the positives. Par for the course.
Today
there’s talk of impending food shortages. The worries weren’t altogether
illegitimate. Those who have sworn by a certain kind of agricultural
paradigm were mortified by the very idea of moving away from chemical
inputs. Yields will decline, they declared. Fair enough for the ‘yield
mantra’ was all about yield and not nutritional density. And we know
that the seed regime was all about higher yields predicated on chemical
inputs. So, since you can’t have chemical thirsty seeds producing
similar yields when starved, you can quickly conclude: lower yields
leading to food scarcity, provided of course the deficit is not sorted
out by imports.
With regard to rice this issue seems to have
been resolved courtesy a pledge by China to gift rice by way of
commemorating long decades of friendship. Of course, we hear people
snickering, ‘went for organic and had to obtain/import chemical rice.’
Paradigm shifts don’t deliver goodies overnight though. Such details are
glossed over.
Wait. Is paradigm shift even possible over many
nights? That’s a legit question, surely? Yes. People have screamed ‘show
me one country where agriculture is totally chemical free!’ What
happened to Bhutan, some ask. Well, for one, it is not that those who
want a different kind of system have got it all right from Day One.
There are mistakes. There are obstacles. There are learning curves. More
importantly, if we took the trouble to think of a chemical-free time,
someone could have similarly screamed at anyone who said ‘chemicals are
the future,’ insisting that he/she name one country that has succeeded
with chemical inputs. The Green Revolution came with much propaganda and
little or no talk about negative repercussions. When that idea went
down the tubes no one said ‘sorry, we were wrong.’ So much for logic!
But
let’s talk about famine. Ok, so we have the rice factor sorted out. So
it’s not an availability issue. There could be an affordability issue.
As the Nobel laureate Amartya Sen and his longtime collaborator Jean
Drèze have emphatically argued, it is an issue of entitlements and not
necessarily availability. People, historically, have fallen victim to
famines not necessarily in situations of failed harvests but even when
there have been bumper crops. ‘Class structures’ would be an appropriate
explanatory window. And when there’s inflation, things can get nasty;
relative ‘ease’ (let’s say) compared with the other countries in worse
situations is no comfort, no consolation.
Back to rice. It’s not
the issue but since it is the staple, it should help retire fears (but
of course not for the politician, as described above). However, it is
not that people eat rice and salt or rice with pol-sambola. We
need vegetables and fruits. Other grains too. The prices are certainly
very high. So, can we say ‘we will have to boil rice and be happy that
something is better than nothing’? ‘We might have to,’ I’ve heard people
say. Let’s hold on to that.
Just the other day, I visited a
village a few kilometers from Ingiriya, courtesy an invitation from
‘Ceylon Food Trails,’ an innovative venture focusing on gastronomy
tourism. The food served at the village, Halwathura, was exclusively
made of what grew or was grown within a five-kilometer radius. So we
didn’t have carrots, cabbage, beetroot, beans etc., some of which by the
way can be ‘home-grown’ even in that area.
In a country such
as Sri Lanka a severe drought could bring on a food-shortage of famine
proportions, yes. That’s not on the cards. We could, however, still have
people suffering from food-related issues. For example, a daily-wage
earner in a city with little or no room to cultivate even some spinach
would have a problem. However, the more serious problem would be of the
mind: having lost the sight to see potential, having got used to getting
things easy and acquiring or submitting to consumption-doctrines that
result in spending large amounts of money on things that are for the
most part unnecessary. So there's an induced decline in income that
could be spent on food and there’s sloth as well as myopia that prevent
people from obtaining something (obviously not ‘everything’) from the
good earth around them.
And yet, if you asked those who scream
‘impending famine’ if they’ve even grown a few chillie plants, maybe a
couple of coconut trees and can recognise the dozen or more plants that
can be used for a malluma, they would be embarrassed. Unless of course ‘shameless’ is part of the political makeup.
Sure,
these are not things that will sustain anyone every single day.
However, they would surely complement and coupled with a more wholesome
and prudent consumption culture, they would certainly ensure no one
starves.
Mountains. Molehills. Hyperbole. Great for the
rhetorician. Useful for the politician. Reality, however, is not an
inevitable companion. Sooner or later, truth surfaces. As mentioned, the
shameless do not care (why should they?). Some truths however, again as
mentioned, will go unseen, unhonoured, unsung. A bit of self-reflection
and a sober assessment of entitlements (denied, stolen and
unrecognized) wouldn’t harm, though.
malindadocs@gmail.com. www.malindawords.blogspot.com
[Malinda
Seneviratne is the Director/CEO of the Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian
Research and Training Institute. These are his personal views.]
1 comments:
Nonsense, Malinda. By 2019, Sri Lanka had been self-sufficient in rice for 10 years and general food security; the only country in South Asia to have achieved this. All of this was destroyed in a decision taken overnight, egged on by lackeys and political shills such as yourself that have zero experience in such matters. There was clear evidence (together with a clear lack of evidence about the effectiveness of this 'organic' scam). The Bathalagoda rice research institute through a study over 22 years predicted that this switch to organic alone would result in a drop in yield that would require at least the import of 800,000MT every year. This was scoffed at - but is exactly where we are headed now. Your own government shills are now stating we need to import 1mil+ MT from China alone at inflated prices(adding to the foreign currency burden as this is a new cost we haven't had to pay for over 10 years). US$520mil to China alone. Compared to the so called 'saving' from importing fertilizer; which was US$260mil in the end in 2019.
Did you know the monthly consumption of rice in Sri Lanka is 180-200k MT? Bet you didn't. Because you don't actually know anything based on facts and figures. You are filled with only hyperbole and rhetoric, like those you accuse. You wouldn't dare debate these facts with someone who actually knows what they're talking about. Instead, you continue to spew this garbage to the ever dwindling audience of Pohottu bumsuckers and paid shills such as yourself. In any other country, at least at this late stage one would repent and perhaps rectify their errors. Not so in Sri Lanka, and not so with yourself. I feel extremely sorry for the future generations of such perpetrators who will have to suffer the karmic effects brought on by the ills and misdeeds their parents (or grandparents) perpetrated in the name of political patronage. For Karma is a bitch indeed.
Post a Comment