Showing posts with label Benjamin Netanyahu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benjamin Netanyahu. Show all posts

17 June 2026

Umble Pie Days in Washington and Tel Aviv

 

Trees have roots. Rivers have sources. So too, phrases. Just the other day, reflecting on the before and continuing ‘after’ of the illegal, unjustified and genocidal attacks carried out against Iran by the world’s worst rogue state combo, USA-Israel, and of course the impending war-ending peace accord or at least many of the drafts circulating these days, the term ‘eat humble pie’ came to mind.

Why, though?

Well, there was a ‘status,’ let’s say, before the two-idiot-circus of Trump and Netanyahu launched attacks on Iran, in the midst of negotiations by the way. Also, by the way, this was the second time within a year that these jokers got their rocks off while talking. Now, more than three months later, the deal that might be inked soon, essentially reverts to that status quo apart from the unfreezing of Iranian assets, some rebuilding-compensation and a pledge to talk about nuclear capabilities. A defeat for the clowns, but not necessarily a victory for Iran, simply on account of the massive damage inflicted on infrastructure and the loss of thousands of lives.

One day the buffoons may be tried for genocide and other crimes against humanity, but I wouldn’t bet on it; not in a world where the big decision makers have each others’ backs.

All that is ‘aside,’ now. The moment ‘humble pie’ came to mind, I wondered where it came from? Well, in my case, I’ve heard it often enough to know what it means, but this was the first time I was curious about its origins. And I couldn’t stop laughing.

Apparently, it is sourced to a medieval dish called ‘umble pie.’ That’s so long ago that the spell-checker doesn’t know of it. I typed the word and it was auto-corrected to ‘humble.’ ‘Umble,’ ladies and gentlemen, was originally, ‘numbles,’ and that was the Middle English word for deer offal.

‘Offal,’ as we know, refers to the internal organs of a butchered animal. Such parts are considered to be inedible, but that’s a class thing which we will get to later on. That term comes from another Middle English word, ‘offall,’ i.e., ‘that which falls off during the butchering process.’

Anyway, ‘umble pie’ was considered cheap, low-class food served to and consumed by servants and peasants. The rich and the noble got the prime cuts. Class-relations are in a sense butchering processes, and the butchered, metaphorically, have to make do, typically, with the scraps, the fallen-offs, that which the butchers considered ‘inedible’ simply because they weren’t ‘prime cuts.’

So how did it bleed into ‘humble pie’? The phonetic shift, I learned, was caused by the frequently dropped ‘h’ sound. There are lots of words beginning with that letter but where the aspirate is unvoiced. It was a clever shift, then, to add the ‘h’ to ‘umble.’ And so, to eat humble pie, would mean that the high and mighty had to forgo the ribeye, tenderloin, drip steak, t-bone etc., and make do with what the lower classes could afford. In other words, internal organs and extremities such as feet and tail. A come down, certainly, although there are delicacies turned out by such body parts which, I am willing to wager, were concocted by creative culinary artists of ‘the underclasses.’

The idiom apparently was in currency by the early 19th century when the phrase was linked to (unwished for) humility. Today, it refers to the condition of being forced to admit or found to have erred or forced to back down following boats. Eating one’s words; that’s another way to put it.

Of course Donald Trump does that a lot. So often, in fact, that his words have become a veritable staple. But this is no joke. Donal Trump, agent and voice of Ugly America and the worst version of Uncle Sam, stamped his feet, screamed his lungs out, mumbled precious nothings, uttered falsehood that have added the term ‘Trumpism’ to the dictum ‘there are lies, damned lies and statistics,’ and is now gulping down loads and loads of ‘inedible’ innards.

It is a pitiful ‘sight’ and an embarrassment to the good people of the United States of America (and of course Israel) whose voices have been drowned by the media-shouts of two maniacs. Then again, perhaps this ‘noise before defeat’ is a sign of turn-around and good things to come.

Trump and Netanyahu will not recognise defeat if it hits them between their respective sets of eyes. ‘Where were you before and where are you now?’ Is a question they will not suffer to answer. They will take lower-order meat cuts, cook them up, lavishly drown them in exotic spices, and claim or at least believe, that they are consuming prime cuts.

Just imagine the likes of Donald Trump, Bibi Netanyahu, J D Vance, Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard sitting at a table picking at the boiled entrails of some unfortunate animal, with pepper and salt as the only available condiments. There you have it. Umble Pie. 

08 April 2026

American civilisation and its discontents

A bit of civilization might do them good

I can’t help but think that anyone who wishes to end a civilisation has to be uncivilised and incapable of creating even the building blocks of civilisation. But then again, it is fascinating is it not that the makers of the English language or rather the inheritors of that language who elevated it to mother-tongue status are the most confused about the meaning of certain words?

Just the other day, a UK lawmaker castigated Iran for ‘being reckless.’ Reckless. Remember the word. The Oxford Learner’s Dictionary (OLD) defines the word as follows: ‘an adjective describing behaviour that shows a lack of care about danger and the possible, often harmful, results of your actions. It implies acting rashly without thinking about consequences.’ A revised version of that dictionary may one day add a synonym: trump. As in ‘Donald’.

Oh yes, bibi, bibi netanyahu, benjamin netanyahu, netanyahu and zionism could work too (the lower case is deliberate and in line with standard style for abstract nouns). They can be thus elevated because what they have done, do and will probably continue to do, ironically, is not at all abstract. Not abstruse, not hypothetical, not unreal. Real. Clear.

Need we elaborate? No!

What would constitute ‘the end of (a) civilisation’? First, what constitutes ‘civilisation’? Let’s ask the OLD. OLD says, ‘a state of human society that is very developed and organised.’ OLD also offers: ‘a society, its culture and its way of life during a particular period of time or in a particular part of the world.’

So, if anyone threatens to end a civilisation as per the OLD definitions, it’s a declaration of genocidal intent. Genocidal intent rehearsed (as in pilot-project, let’s say) from Day One of the attacks on Iran by trump and bibi (yes, lower case, for we need to rehearse these abstract-nouns-to-be, although this does not strictly conform to grammar rules; but then again let’s say ‘poetic license’ and leave it at that), we must point out.

America of the United States. Is it a ‘civilisation’? It’s certainly a human society. It is developed, as per the dominant paradigm of development, one could argue. Organised, yes, although it’s organised subjugation, mind-control, land-theft, resource-extraction etc., in the USA and elsewhere. It is a society, yes. Fractured, violent, racist, exploitative and such, but yes, a society nevertheless. Its culture is perhaps more in flux than most societies, but the transformations of culture and constant remixing could, in sum, deserve the term. It has many ways of life (and death as well; think KKK, BLM and the many genocidal wars launched over the last two centuries).

It does exist in a particular part of this world. It exists, moreover, in this moment in time. Two hundred years is not ‘old’ in civilisational terms. Two hundred years of expansion by way of land theft, invasion and purchase wouldn’t make ‘civilisation’ a pretty word, but let’s be generous. It’s a civilisation. Of sorts. Let’s say.

But trump? Is he civilised? A pathological liar accused of being a pedophile and who abused the powers of his office to trip relevant investigations, this man (and his partner in many crimes, bibi) twice attacked Iran in the middle of negotiations. He bombed or sanctioned (and hurrahed) the bombing of dozens of schools, hospitals and other civilian facilities, killing over 2000 people including children, the elderly and sick because he wanted to prevent Iran from retaliating to bombing. Would that be the talk of a civilised human being or a deranged egotist?

And he wants to end a civilisation. Didn’t happen and probably will not happen, but that intent to destroy is fascinating isn’t it? Envy is a powerful motive, but he is way too full of himself to envy anyone. In fact it’s the opposite that’s true. Contempt. His speeches are full of derogatory and racist epithets.

Enough. The man is uncivilised, even though the BBC, CNN, Fox, Al Jazeera and other media outfits don’t dare say it. Maybe they should check the OLD and check whether their media practices conform to the definition offered therein for ‘civilisation,’ ‘civilised,’ ‘civil,’ ‘civility’ etc. Also, genocide, ethics, principle and other such lovely words, while they are at it.

But enough. We know this POTUS (President of the United States) well enough.

But what of the people of the USA who make that dysfunctional society that has so much potential to build a great nation or at least one that deserves to stand with the civilised world? What of them? What has all this done to their signature and its civilisational potential?

The aforementioned media outfits don’t (dare?) report on what the people of the USA have to say. Nothing of the massive and indignant protests against the bloody adventurism of their president. But those people are alive. If America of the United States is a country that aspires to civilisation, then the seeds necessary for the full flowering of all things that make that word meaningful are alive in their hearts.

They know what ‘reckless’ means. They know what ‘genocide’ means. They know what ‘civilisation’ means. They know that their country has to walk quite a distance, perhaps decades but maybe even a few centuries (or a few months), to get there.

They have one thing going for them. Trump. Think about it. He’s shedding all the frills that have hidden the proverbial ‘Ugly American.’ Disgusting. So disgusting that the beautiful people of the USA will have to do something about it.

Civilisation. A great idea for the United States of America. And Zionist Israel Let’s hope they get there one day.


Malinda Seneviratne is a freelance writer. malindadocs@gmail.com.


22 July 2014

The word ‘defense’ is confused


I am a noun.  Check your online dictionary and you’ll find that I am a useful noun.  Indeed, I am a necessary noun in these times of arrogance and aggression and not just originating from verbal (meaning ‘from verb’) quarters.  That’s always been the case, come to think of it.   But these are aggressive days of the missile kind.  In such a reality my worth naturally is enhanced.  It’s best to get a hang of who I am so let’s go with definitions.

Defense. The act of defending against attack, danger or injury.  A means or method of defending or protecting.  In sports it refers to the act or an instance of defending a championship against a challenger.   In law it is an argument in support or justification of something.  There’s a serious element to it too: It refers to the military, governmental, and industrial complex, especially as it authorizes and manages weaponry production. 

There is an antonym too.  Well, antonyms, really: harm, injury, capitulation, flight, hurt, betrayal, desertion and surrender.

I am a noun that is confused.  Here’s my confusion.  Just the other day some morons decided it was fun or expedient to harm some people.  The idiots were associated with the Palestinian organization called Hamas and the victims were citizens of Israel.  That set the ball rolling.  I was thrown this way and that, up and down. It’s been quite a rollercoaster ride since then.  Since then it’s all been about me.  The noun.  Defense. 

People have used my name like they never have before. Well, not really, for whenever someone wants to justify any kind of aggression they pick me as a kind of shield.  It’s the same with words like democracy, peace, justice and freedom.  Lots of crimes including those against humanity have been committed in our names.  But these days it’s all about me.  Defense. 

A man called Benjamin Netanyahu has, in my name, vowed to ‘do whatever is necessary’.  Now ‘whatever necessary’ is a codeword for unleashing anything from bullet to chemical weapons, noxious and poisonous gases and even the atom bomb, history is full of examples.  Netanyahu’s pals in Washington have more or less endorsed the man’s position.  Again in my name.  Defense.

Now for my confusion.  In my name things have been done that harmful and injurious.  People have been killed in my name.  The death count has passed 200 I heard.  That’s ‘defense’?  That’s me?  I can’t recognize myself in the mirror, sorry in the text voice-cut transcripts, any more.  Who am I?

Then, if that weren’t enough, outfits people by those who make their living peddling peace, justice, freedom, rights and such, people who abhor and cry and scream against violence, injury, conflict etc., are to be brought under an authority set up in my name.  A ministry in fact.  The Ministry of Defense.  Not in Israel, but here in Sri Lanka. 


Is that to defend those valiant and ‘blameless’ people from the horrors of this world?  Or is it to defend the ministry and whatever it stands for FROM those same people? Is it something that’s neither or something that is made of bits of both?  Whatever it is, I am confused.  I am defense.  I feel defenseless.   

*All this in a parallel universe