Showing posts with label Sri Lanka Law and Order. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sri Lanka Law and Order. Show all posts

28 October 2018

Time's up, Pujitha

It’s a name that has religious connotations. Pujith. Translatable as ‘[he who has] received [typically an offering of a religious/ritualistic kind]. A past participle form of the verb give/offer. It usually implies veneration of one kind or another.  

It reminds one of the second verse of the Maha Mangala Sutra: Asevanā ca bālānam, panditānañ ca sevanā; pūjā ca pūjanīyānam, etam mangala muttamam [Not to associate with the foolish, but to associate with the wise, and to honor those worthy of honor -- this is the highest blessing].

 What has Pujith Jayasundara received? Has he been honored and if so is he deserving of honor? 



Pujith Senadhi Bandara Jayasundara is the 34th Inspector-General of Police, Sri Lanka and was appointed as per the recommendation of the Constitutional Council on April 20, 2016. Like most public servants, especially those holding senior positions, Pujith has received bouquets and brickbats over the course of his 33 year career.  The identity and political bent of the particular tosser of bouquets or thrower of brickbats indicates whether he was or is worthy of the particular ‘gift’.  There are of course incontrovertible facts which, when taken together, would no doubt tell us whether Pujith lived up to his name.

In the early stages of his career he was known as a fearless officer and was cheered for not pussyfooting around issues, especially those that had ethnic flavor. Naturally those who believed he sided with them were the cheerleaders, never mind that he was basically following the rule book. In later years Pujith earned a reputation for being an unrelenting campaigner in the war on drug-trafficking. He even earned a ‘punishment transfer’ which usually indicates that the punished had earned the wrath of the punisher for the crime of not toeing the line. Certainly something worthy of salutation; pooja if you wish.  

A good officer is not one who has commendable achievements on his or her curriculum vitae.  An individual is finally judged by overall record. Stellar performance is lauded but it is not a license for sloth, incompetence or abuse of authority at a later date.  

Pujith is not exactly the most popular IGP ever. Popularity is easily purchased of course and it is only one indicator that an individual is kosher in the public perception; the public regularly elect crooks let us not forget. The issue is far more serious.

A few days ago Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe blocked the IGP and five others including the Deputy Minister of Law and Order Nalin Bandara from attending a study tour of Scotland. The reason is that the IGP is currently the subject of a ministerial inquiry.  The subject of the inquiry is an alleged conspiracy to kill President Maithripala Sirisena and former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa. 

That’s serious and that’s not all. Pujith has been in the midst of controversy throughout his tenure as IGP. In December 2016 he was caught on television (no less!) speaking on his mobile phone to someone he addressed as ‘Sir’ and confirming that he had instructed the Financial Crimes Investigations Chief (FCID) to not arrest someone he referred to as “Nilame”. That was out of order, but no action was taken by the Yahapalana Government over this clear violation of ethics and practices associated with the notion of ‘good governance’ and a contravention of the procedures set down by the Police Commission.

President Sirisena, at the time, said he would call for explanation from the IGP, but then again, Puhith has blurted out that he has a check to cash and that the President cannot or will not touch him. 

Leaked video footage has the IGP abusing subordinates including a female office who he threatened to rape, certainly cause for severe disciplinary action. However, it was reported in the website Colombo Telegraph that Pujith had around that time had bragged about ‘impunity’: 

“I am the one who saved President’s son Daham when he and his friends went berserk and smashed the Clique night club and assaulted its staff. The President was not in the country at that time. He was very worried and I took care of that problem for President Sirisena. I obtained all related CCTV footage from all the buildings surrounding the Clique night club including their own CCTV footage. I even advised the Maradana Police Station and to the entire Police force not to proceed with any investigations and not talk to the media. I also arranged for President Sirisena to watch the CCTV footage on his return. 

“Then President himself spoke to all the media heads and begged them not to expose the incident, although bloody Colombo Telegraph had by then exclusively carried the entire episode including video footage of the saga. Several social media copied it and then carried the story. Only one daily newspaper published a story about the incident, but they did not mention Daham Sirisena’s name. They referred to Daham as the son of a VVIP. This is how I managed to hush up the entire incident.

“I not only saved President Sirisena and his son, but I also saved all the Veyangoda gangsters from media exposure who happened to be the President’s relatives” he went on to confess.”Still the Sri Lankan public have no idea about who that VVIP was.”

He’s been abusive to others as well. A few weeks ago, he was caught on camera using foul language on teachers at an event in a school and being disrespectful to members of the clergy. 

All this is put to shade by the allegation that he obtained a bribe of Rs. 12 million from a former principal of Trinity College, Kandy in 2008, according to a complaint received by the Bribery Commission. This was when he was the DIG in charge of the Central Province. Court had ordered the then Principal of Trinity College, Robert Gilbert, to be deported but apparently he had been in hiding in Kandy.  The bribe, according to the complaint, was given in the form of cash check dated August 20, 2008 from Account Number 180837076 maintained at the Kandy Branch of the Hatton National Bank by persons connected to Trinity College.

Perhaps he is correct. He does have a check to cash. Perhaps this is why no action whatsoever has been taken on Pujith by the Police Commission or the President so far. Perhaps this is why, according to reports, he’s been offered the post of Ambassador to South Korea upon retirement.  Sources in the Police Department have said that Pujith has been canvassing for a more plush diplomatic post, i.e. in the USA. Given the track record that is not entirely unbelievable. 

The issue is, how anyone in his or her right mind can even consider rewarding a man with such a sorry track record as IGP any post, diplomatic or otherwise, upon retirement.  The term ‘in cahoots’ comes to mind immediately. What’s this mutual back-scratching about? Who is returning favors and why?  

Anyway, what has Pujith done in terms of the tasks that goes with his post? Has the law and order situation in the country improved? The Deputy Minister says it has, but he’s been pulling numbers from a hat, so to speak. Whatever Pujith delivered in earlier stages of his career in combatting the drug menace, it is clear now that he is reluctant or incapable of doing anything to arrest the situation. 

He did not of course inherit a stellar police force. His work and the work of any successor (and like that of his predecessors) was severely compromised by a culture generated in part by the war years where officers had to operate outside the framework of regular police work. Incompetency was further exacerbated reservists were absorbed into the Police consequent to an election promise. They were neither qualified nor trained.  Indeed in-service training has been another issue that has gone under Pujith’s radar. Not just his, of course. 

Regardless, he could have at least made sure that things didn’t get worse. He failed. The post is now not unlike the proverbial gold chain on a chameleon’s neck.  Pujith is undeserving. It’s a weight too big for him. 

There are obvious questions that those who need to address such issues are not asking themselves: a) Who appointed Pujith and why? b) Why are his many excesses ignored? c) Why is there talk of him being rewarded, regardless? d) Isn’t the law and order situation a concern of such magnitude that this man should be sacked, a better individual appointed and definite steps taken to overhaul the entire Department, from recruitment to training to continuous review of progress and so on?

We are not in the middle of a war. In all civil matters pertaining to peace and security of life and property, the Police Department has a crucial role to play. This Police Department has failed or rather has been made to fail. No ‘gifts’ for answering the question, ‘why?’ In short, we are not blessed. Pujith Jayasundara is not only the most powerful police officer in the country, the post he holds is symbolic of the Department. When such a designation is not worthy or honor and in fact is worthy only of contempt, it is indicative that the entire country and the entire citizenry are debased, humiliated and put at severe risk.

Malinda Seneviratne is a political analyst and freelance writer. He can be reached at malindasenevi@gmail.comwww.malindawords.blogspot.com

02 April 2012

Kahawatta is our country

The gruesome murder of a 52 year old woman and her 18 year old daughter in Kahawatta shocked the entire country.  A lot has happened since that tragic night of January 31, 2012. The story of drug dealing, political patronage, abuse of trust and innocence, revenge intended and exacted etc has all come out.  

When the story unfolded and the culprits apprehended, a community divested itself of rage by burning four houses, including those of the main suspect and his politician brother.  This is how Kahawatta became a synonym for lawlessness and one hopes that arrest, detention and indictment will cool these unholy fevers, sooner rather than later. 

What is most disturbing is that certain elements of the Kahawatta tragedy are common to other parts of the country as well, in particular the nexus between criminality and politics, criminal and politician.  At all levels. 

The main suspect, Raju is the brother of Pradeshiya Sabha member who was, until a few days ago, the Coordinating Secretary of a Minister.  The story validates the commonly held view that politics and drugs are closely related. 

The suspects in this case had been apprehended on four occasions by the Police but on each occasion, it is reported, they had to be released before they could be properly questioned.  It took a special CID team to finally interrogate and obtain a confession.  In other words, for 34 days, that unfortunate community was forced to have in their midst a set of murderers.

Sadly, all this comes under ‘business as usual’ in this country.  Almost everyone knows of a story where known wrongdoers get off scot free or with (at worst) a light reprimand courtesy the invariable ‘call from the top’, the ‘top’ being some local political bigwig.  Interference is the name of the game and it has been virtually a national sport for way too long now. 

The crux of the matter is that law enforcement officers simply do not have the independence to do their jobs.  Their efficiency is therefore compromised while their errors are magnified.  This country simply does not have an overall institutional arrangement that can stop politicians (and the wealthy, who are wont to heavily fund politicians in return for all manner of favours including immunity from investigation) from taking a bite off the justice system. 

Non-compliance can result in punishment transfers and severely denting chances of career advancement.  When powerful politicians bear upon senior police officers to look the other way, their juniors take note. They learn and they put into practice the knowledge gained.  They learn to let big fish slip away.  In this context it is indeed to the credit of the CID that the suspects were actually taken in.  It implies that somewhere close to the top there are people who are actually interested in justice.  To be fair, there have been instances where police officers have shown exemplary courage and integrity, but such individuals are heavily outnumbered by the servile, many of whom double up as takers. 

When law enforcement is influenced by politicians it is to that very extent compromised.  We have seen how police officers have refused point black to investigate acts of thuggery that have been reported as-it-is-happening on television.  When a man ties up another man, that’s not ‘consensual’ or some kinky sexual ritual.  The man who did the tying was in fact giving the finger to law enforcement and the law.  The police took the finger, as it were, without shame. So too the AG’s Department. So too his parliamentary colleagues. So too his political party.  So too every single person who chose to look the other way. 

We know that the 17th Amendment offered an outside chance to correcting the institutional flaws pertaining to policing.  We know that the 18th took away that chance.  Be that as it may, in the end what is important is not who appoints who but what the appointed does with his/her appointment and office.  That’s where integrity is tested.

  In this situation there can be no talk of devolving police powers unless one believes there is something substantial in the matter of devolving thuggery or giving free rein to thugs. 

Kahawatta is our country and not a small geographical entity located in some district far away from the high seats of power.  Kahawatta is a tragedy and a defining symbol of ‘things as they are’, top to bottom, left to right. 

No one wants to live in Kahawatta.  Period.  Kahawatta needs to be erased from the political map and that erasing must begin with constitution.  The truth is the beneficiaries of ‘Kahawattization’ will not fiddle with the constitution (why discard a ‘good thing’?).  Who then will do the erasing and when?  The latter is hard to predict.  As for the former, the answer is clear: good people, courageous people, patriots.  If terrorism could have been eradicated, this is not impossible.  If politicians won’t lift a finger, the people must make them lift it. 

There’s a fight to recover a decent map.  It’s not about parties, colour and ideologies. It is about patriotism.  Whose side are you on and what are you going to do about it?  

[See 'Editor's Blog' in THE NATION]