Showing posts with label Sunanda Karunaratne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sunanda Karunaratne. Show all posts

13 August 2026

Looking for and missing Lakdasa Wikkramasinha

 


 

Some years ago I chanced upon the grave of Lakdasa Wikkramasinha, the English language poet whose iconic credentials draw from who was remarkably at odds with the political and ideological predilections of the English-speaking literati of his time and who in subject, style and metaphor was more a ‘Sinhala poet’ than most poets writing in that language. That chance discovery inspired an article titled ‘Mis-residencing Lakdasa Wikkramasinha’ published in the now defunct ‘The Nation.’  

A few weeks ago, Samod Porawagamage, an academic and a poet, asked me where Lakdasa’s grave was. I had a vague recollection of its location but told him that we would have to go look.  A few days ago, I was at the Borella Kanatta and having an hour or so to wait for a funeral ceremony, decided to look for Lakdasa’s grave, just so I could tell Samod.

I couldn’t find it. Lakdasa’s final resting place must be there and one day I will re-discover it. Or not. 

A couple of years ago, Lakdasa resurfaced or was resurrected by Aparna Halpe and Michael Ondaatje who put together a collection of his poetry. Award-winning Sinhala poet Sunanda Karunaratne has since taken on the task of translating the collection into Sinhala. He has already translated close to half the collection and it has been an invigorating experience to discuss each translation along with the original.

But walking among graveyards ‘looking’ for Lakdasa I was struck by the number of headstones with inscriptions totally obliterated by time and the elements. Maybe the near and dear who attended the burial and placed a headstone thereafter have passed on themselves. Maybe after a generation or two there was no one left on the island to visit, lay flowers and re-letter those blank pieces of stone or concrete. Maybe too much time has passed for anyone to remember the names of the particular ancestors.

It is unlikely that any of the dead were subjected to damnatio memoriae. It is not by official decree alone that people get ‘erased’ and forgotten. Anyway, it took me back to a day in January 1992: my maternal grandfather’s final rites before cremation.

I heard the Pali phrase anicca vata sankhara or ‘impernant, alsa, are all things,’ and not for the first time. I had already heard people say or seen the words ‘roopaya dirai, naamaya nodirai,’ meaning ‘the body perishes but not the name.’ And I remember seeing a photograph of someone who was probably my maternal great great grandfather and realising that I didn’t know his name. My maternal grandmother passed away in 2008, my mother in 2009, her brother in 2012 and her sister in 2025. Their remaining two sisters and brother might know the name of the person. I should ask. Eventually, though, the names will be forgotten.



Not all names are forgotten though. Historians keep names alive, but I can’t help but wonder if the persons associated with those names were anything like they are made out to be by historians, folklore and other exercises in what amounts to legend-making.

Who was Lakdasa and does the Lakdasa of those who remember him still, either on account of acquaintance or through his work, remain intact or does it change as the person remembering or reading changes? Probably the latter.

His poetry is intact though. For how long we don’t know. The final resting place of poets is a dusty bookshelf at the back of a used books store, I once wrote. Depending on the place a poet holds in the literary universe, some one might interject. True.

But then again, is it only the ‘great’ poets who have extended ‘shelf life,’ so to speak? Vihanga Perera, another academic and also an award-winning writer of both prose and verse, in a note on a poet rarely remembered or acknowledged as an important poetic voice ('The importance of the “Selected Poems” of Gamini Seneviratne to contemporary readership’), introduces as interesting term: ‘patronage of gatekeepers.’  

It is not only time that fades memory. There are elements other than wind, fire, earth and water that are at work. Happens to history and happens to works of art, literature included. There’s politics at work. Deference to gatekeepers help. Ignoring them can cost.

Lakdasa’s poetry was in the Advanced Level English Literature syllabus back in the 1980s. It was in the English syllable of the University of Peradeniya in the mid-eighties. I am pretty sure students of English literature in Sri Lanka have heard of him or studied his work. But how many Sinhala and Tamil writers and students of Sinhala and Tamil literature in Sri Lanka know, I wonder. And, by the same token, how many people who do not know Sinhala or Tamil know of the great literary figures who wrote or write in those languages?

Does it matter, one may ask. Not really. Time passes. Things change. People forget. Of the over 7,000 languages spoken in the world I know just two. There are stories and songs, no doubt, in each and every one of the languages I do not know. My life would be so much richer did I have access to half a dozen of them, even in translation. It doesn’t mean that my life or those of others like me are worthless or less meaningful.

I couldn’t find Lakdasa’s grave. I have his poetry. Sunanda’s effort will give thousands of people access to Lakdasa’s poetry. They will read them as they will and they will resurrect a Lakdasa through that process. And it doesn’t really matter that the person they conjure thus is nothing like the Lakdasa who lived and wrote.

Last night, for reasons that had nothing to do with any of the above, I checked out some iconic scenes of the movie “Dead Poets’ Society.” As Mr Keating, the central character played by the late and inimitable Robin Williams, could have said it, ‘they are all food for worms’ or ‘are fertilising daffodils’. Well, they are all probably done feeding and fertilising.

Then again, watching those clips, I got to listen once again to the opening lines of the 17th century poem ‘To the virgins, to make much of time,’ by Robert Herrick. I didn’t know the title or the poet until last night.  But those lines!

Gather ye rosebuds while ye may,
   Old Time is still a-flying;
And this same flower that smiles today
   Tomorrow will be dying.


He’s gone. Herrick, I mean. He is alive though. So too Lakdasa. Even if I never revisit the Borella Kanatta again or I never find his grave, however many times I walk among those graves. He is not there anyway. Doesn’t really matter.    

 

See Also: Re-residencing Lakdasa Wikkramasinha 

19 December 2022

Of love and other intangibles


 

Sunanda Karunaratne, poet, friend and author of ‘Pehenada Pahan (Brilliant Lamps),’ asked me a question upon reading my recent article ‘Continents of the heart.’ He was referring to a poem by Arseney Tarkovsky (The Word). Aeseney urges would-be poets, among other things, to ‘refrain from prophesy.’ 

Sunanda had a question: ‘Why do you think Tarkovsky advised poets to refrain from prophesy?'

My shorthand answer: ‘Because human relations are fragile.  Too many intangibles. This is why Neruda says love is the most beautiful thing but only at the beginning.’

I know Neruda said something like that, maybe in a poem or perhaps in some comment on love, but I can’t find the source. If I remember right it was in ‘Residence on Earth.’

There is forever love, I am sure. I am not sure, though, if the love of the first dawn, in fragrance and hue, texture and flavour, the in the music of vulnerability and willing submission to the possibility of multiple strikes from the sharpest blade, remains clothed in the purest of dew drops at dusk and during long nights deadened by familiarity and scarred by frailties never imagined possible. I suppose that if friendship and affection remain, if rancour is but an easily avoidable rut along the togetherness path , if forgiving is possible even though forgetting is difficult, there will be something that could legitimately be called love.

A different kind of beauty, then. Crystalline perfection shattered in ignorance and arrogance and the shards put together to produce glance and reflection less breathtaking but still permitting occasional breathlessness. Enough for word-sculpture.  

Sometime in the year 2004, I offered the following observation on love: mohothai, sundarai, epamanai (a moment, sweet and that’s all). Chaaminda Rathnasuriya, lyricist and a fellow copywriter at Phoenix-Ogilvy Advertising (he was legit, I was correctly described by another lyricist-copywriter, Vajira Mahakanumulla, as ‘a part-time, trainee translator') wrote down the same lines and gave this ‘poem’ a different title. He replaced ‘premaya (love) with ‘raagaya (lust)’ and was teased throughout his tenure at Phoenix by Irvin Weerackody about ‘shrungaaraathmaka kavi (sensuous poetry).’

Years later during the course of a conversation, Chaaminda referred to this poetic exercise which is one of the many tender markers of our friendship. A moment, he said, could last an eternity. And I told him that I had yet another take: ‘premaya: mohothai, sundarai, amathakai (love: a moment, sweet, forgotten).  


Partly true, partly a twist to flavour the moment, we were clowns then as now.  

Sometime not too long after we spoke about our poetic game, there was an intense conversation of rare grace between two people 'metaphored' by the colours lime green and turquoise blue. It was a short love story and was titled as such:


A long, long time ago
from a touchstone of poetry
two sparks flew
one was Lime Green
and the other Turquoise Blue
they didn't flare and die
as sparks usually do
but encounter begged
mortality was shelved
and spark became ink.


There are ink stains and their fading will take time. The heart-breath of lovers does not evaporate in time’s dry seasons. It gets turned into memories of petals and songs which inspire multiple covers. It strikes up friendships with threads that get embroidered on hearts so young that they are like ancient manuscripts. It gets forgotten, only to be remembered by others who inevitably come later, determined to water the most unforgiving deserts with the blood of wordless-feet.

Am I prophesying, would Sunanda think, I ask myself. I don’t know. Maybe it’s just an extrapolation of what I’ve experienced. The breath of innumerable and anonymous poets, the stories of loves and lovers who had but a moment and chose to embrace it knowing well that it would condemn each to separate valleys of tears, the half-erased carbon footprint of romance yearning for the lost dust that has taken the terrible truths of love to hearts tender enough to read the languages of separation — I’ve known of their existence and sometimes noted the traces they’ve left.

We are poor copywriters and our training as translators of romance-language will always remain incomplete. All we know is that there are moments beautiful enough to convince ourselves that similar moments could come again, that in fact they are imminent and await recognition and embrace.

We are poor poets, all of us, Chaaminda, Sunanda and I, and I’m sure they won’t take this as an insult. We are faithful if imperfect transcribers of intangibles that tease, love that devastates and yet proves again and again that yes, we are alive, we breathe and therefore can be rendered breathless.

malindadocs@gmail.com

 

['The Morning Inspection' is the title of a column I wrote for the Daily News from 2009 to 2011, one article a day, Monday through Saturday. This is a new series.]
 

Other articles in this series:

Neruda, Sekara and literary dimensions

The universe of smallness

Paul Christopher's heart of many chambers

Calmness gracefully cascades in the Dumbara Hills

Serendipitous amber rules the world

Continents of the heart 

The allegory of the slow road