Showing posts with label The Interception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Interception. Show all posts

18 August 2020

Coolness!

 

M.S. Dhoni has retired from all forms of international cricket. ‘There goes a legend,’ sums up the sentiments expressed by one and all. Now ‘MS’ scored just six centuries in 90 tests. His test average is a middling 38.09. He had greater at-wicket presence in ODIs, with an average of 50.57 in 350 matches. His glove-work is certainly impressive, accounting for 256 catches and 38 stumpings in tests (321 catches and 123 stumpings in ODIs).

He was a leader and this makes raises the worth of the above numbers. A level-headed finisher, he was also a master at damage control when things got out of hand. Countless are the times when he stepped in to bring sanity when India’s top order had gone insane. No wonder then that he is often referred to as Mister Cool or Captain Cool.

He was cool. Dhoni seldom showed emotion. He had absolute focus. Rarely fazed, regardless of the match-situation or tempers that had frayed. It was as though he had abstracted himself from all that was extraneous to the particular job at hand, be it farming the strike or getting to a place where risks could be taken in a tight or even seemingly impossible chase.

There are debates over who was ‘cooler,’ Dhoni or Rahul Dravid. Now Arjuna Ranatunga is sometimes thought of as ‘Captain Cool’ (of that time) but that’s a misnomer. He was cool to the extent that he was never overawed by the names, reputation or even the gamesmanship and below-the-belt operations of the opposition. He had his Dhoni-like moments and was a hero in his own right. Perhaps it is unfair to compare, Dhoni having entered the scene as Arjuna was leaving. Let’s say both seemed to have resolved not to let emotion best reason. Both were thinking cricketers. Thinking skippers. Cool men.

Coolness is not something one is born with. Well, one might have a cool gene but it needs to be cultivated. How does one cultivate coolness?

There are no easy answers. We are all human. We all have emotions. We experience joy and sorrow and are often carried away by them. A good shot (in cricket) can lift us and also rob us of just that fraction of concentration that will make for an error that costs dearly. A bowler who gets carted out of the park can lose his line and length.

It’s important to be in the moment of the six or the wicket-taking delivery, enjoy it, and then put it aside. It is important to get one’s wits under control after a bad moment, re-take the guard, so to speak. Get back on track, in other words. For every single delivery, every single moment on the field. Every innings, every match. Season after season.  

Of course being cool won’t give you Tendulkar-like stats, but it helps you be the best you can be or at least close to that.

It’s all about temperament. The mind. It’s perhaps like an actor ‘getting into character’ before making his/her entrance, before speaking his/her lines.

People like MS set examples. They set standards. That’s why they are legends. They are cool beyond compare. On and off the field. That has to take discipline at some level. A lot has to happen before we can taste the fruit of our labor. Got to prepare the soil, got to tend the tender sampling, got to fertilize, got to protect from pests, got to harvest carefully. Works in agriculture. Works in sports.  

And MS, thanks for the moments. Thanks for the years. And for teaching us that one way to keep the heat on is to remain cool.

This article was published in 'The Morning' [August 17, 2020]

Other articles in the series titled 'The Interception' [published in 'The Morning']

Do you have a plan? Strengths and weaknesses It's all about partnerships

04 August 2020

The debate over sports

The team representing Sri Lanka at the World Schools Debating Championship.
L-R: Janul De Silva, Rahul De Silva, Shalem Sumanthiran (Captain), Chanidu Ratnayake and
Jasmine Markandu.

On Sunday the 2nd of August Sri Lanka’s schools debating team reached the final of the World Schools Debating Championship (held online for the first time) and lost to Canada.

There were 68 countries competing, with six preliminary rounds in two divisions, Maya and Aztec. Sri Lanka, drawn in the Maya Division, along with debating heavyweights such as Singapore, China and India, won the first two rounds against South Korea (a 2-1 split decision) and Rwanda (3-0). Sri Lanka lost to the 2018 Champions, China, in a 2-1 split decision and by a similar margin to Bangladesh in the third and fourth rounds respectively. The fifth was a clear 3-0 win against Sudan as was the sixth against Namibia.

Having qualified for the ‘partial double “octos,” (Round of 24) for the first time ever, Sri Lanka beat Scotland on a 4-1 decision.’ They beat England on a unanimous 5-0 decision in the Round of 16. Sri Lanka beat Hong Kong in a 5-2 decision in the quarter finals. Hong Kong, which came first in the Maya Division had been unbeaten up to this point. Sri Lanka won a unanimous 7-0 decision against Ireland in the semi-final. Canada beat Sri Lanka on a 8-1 split decision in the final.

Sri Lanka was the highest placed ESL team (countries where English is a secondary language) while team captain, Shalem Sumanthiran (Royal College) was ranked 7th among ESL speakers in the Maya Division and overall. Chanidu Ratnayake (Ananda College), Janul De Silva (Royal College), Jasmin Markandu and Rahil De Silva(CIS) were the other members of the team with Reiha Wilamasekara (Ladies’ College) being the reserve. The team was coached by Kithmina Hewage with Sajit Dias as the Technical Coach.

Now this is no ‘one-off’ thing. Sri Lankan teams (representing schools as well as the country) have performed remarkably well in international tournaments over the years, regularly making it beyond the preliminary rounds. There have been teams that have made it to the semis semis and beyond. On occasion, Sri Lankan teams have even won such tournaments. 

Now one might wonder why I’m writing about debating in a ‘sports column.’ It's simple. Debating is not considered a sport. No colors are given. There is a national body that organizes tournaments, selects teams to represent the country. There are programs to popularize debating in all parts of the country and to help students develop skills. It's not a sport though, as mentioned above. Indeed, many would not consider it a 'game' either.

Those who are passionate about chess, scrabble, bridge, carrom and other games that involve very little physical activity are used to being ridiculed by those who are convinced that only those activities that make one sweat profusely where risk of injury is very real qualify to be called ‘a sport.’  

Of course regardless of whether or not one has to run, jump, throw one’s arms around, roll on the grass and bruise one’s shins and elbows, there are very few activities that do not require one to be in good physical condition. That, for the purists, is not enough. I would agree.

However, if it’s about competing, strategizing, meticulous preparation, studying the opponent(s), ascertaining strengths and weaknesses, innovating on the go, responding adequately to surprises and all those other things associated with sweaty sports, if you will, then it would be hard to draw the relevant lines.

Chess is not an olympic sport since there are criteria such as length of a match, well established training and refereeing apparatuses etc that need to be met for the International Olympic Committee to give approval. Perhaps in the near future the boxes will be ticked. Neither is cricket an olympic sport, just for the record. In Sri Lanka, chess is a sport as far as the Sports Ministry and the Sports Act are concerned. Carrom too. There is a bridge federation as well. I am not sure about scrabble. Debating is not considered a sport.

One of the arguments raised by the objectors is that in debating, for instance, winners are not objectively decided. It’s the subjective views of the judges that count, they argue. This is true. On the other hand, sports such as diving, gymnastics, synchronized swimming are Olympic sports and winners are decided by points accorded by judges. No ‘finishing lines’ in these sports. There are no scores for all to see (as is the case in rugby, basketball, hockey, soccer, volleyball, netball etc).

Perhaps it is time to revisit the 'sweat-is-a-must' argument about what is and is not 'a sport'. Let's debate.


This article was published in 'The Morning' [August 04, 2020]

Other articles in the series titled 'The Interception' [published in 'The Morning']

Do you have a plan? Strengths and weaknesses It's all about partnerships


malindasenevi@gmail.com


28 July 2020

You can leave the butterflies for later

The Royal College Cricket Team 1984
[Graham Lawrence, 4th from left, standing]

Joel Garner, Colin Croft, Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall and Andy Roberts. All of them were much-feared fast bowlers. They played together just once, but for most of the 1980s, opposing teams had to contend with four or three of them and even then there were others as fearsome who would be asked to step up and would deliver. In fact the West Indies had a reliable pace battery into the mid 1990s which included Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh, Patrick Patterson, Ian Bishop and Winston Benjamin.  

Today, there’s talk of England’s current pace quartet (Chris Broad, James Anderson, Chris Woakes and Jofra Archer) being the best attacked produced by that country in quite a while. It’s not fair to compare players of different eras and it’s not possible to count and compare the butterflies that worried the tummies of batsmen who had to face such bowlers. Let’s leave aside comparisons. Let’s talk butterflies.

It’s all about pressure. The particular batsman’s form, general level of confidence, track-record against a particular bowler or bowling attack, the match situation all come into play.

My column-muse Sarath Weerakoon sent a note about pressure recently.

‘The pressure you face in games is simply nothing compared to the pressure some other people have to face. For example, the pressure that a  frontline soldier faces  from an enemy attack is a [far more] nerve- wracking experience than  a cricketer faces. Having a perspective like this can help you perform better under pressure.’

You can tell yourself anything to sort out nerves, but in the end you have to face the music, so to speak. Sometimes you are ready, sometimes not. Sometimes you can use the Weerakoon Method, if you will, but sometimes you just don’t have the time. Graham Lawrence, for example, didn’t have time to philosophize or prep himself up at the 105th Battle of the Blues.

Now Graham was Royal’s opening bowler. He could bat, but he was certainly not a one-down bat or a (virtual) opener that circumstances forced him to be.

Royal had a tough time from the get go. His opening partner, Inam Cassim injured his back bowling the very first over.  St Thomas’, led by Sidat Samarakkody, went on to declare at 236 for 8 about an hour before close of play.

‘Clearly our strategy was one of surviving the anxious hour in fading light. Viraj Perera got out for a duck and I was sent in as a nightwatchman with clear instructions to stay there with Nurendra Perera, the other opener,’ Graham reminisced a few years ago.

Kaushik Amalean and Mohanna Marzook weren’t anything like the aforementioned Windies greats but neither was Graham a Graham Gooch, Allan Border, Dilip Vengsarkar or David Boon.  Amalean and Marzoon weren’t anything like Broad and Co., but neither was Graham a Kraigg Brathwaite, Shamarh Brooks, Ralston Chase or Jermaine Blackwood.


‘I was petrified!  Balls were whizzing past my ear, although to everyone’s surprise I hooked a short delivery for Kaushik for four!  Anyway, I had a job to do and we managed to survive until the close,’ he said.

His determination was of course acknowledged and praised.  Naturally, he was asked to deliver more of the same the following morning.  He did negotiate the early swing at the SSC for an hour or so.  

Royal scored 212 and STC put up 172 for the loss of 5 wickets in the second innings, setting a target of 197.

‘It was going to be tough. Inam didn’t bat in the first innings, so we were playing with just 10.  My performance in the first innings prompted the coach to send me in at No 3 in the second innings as well.’

Again, he was a virtual opener, since Viraj got his second duck of the game.  Again he did the needful — solid blocking, intelligent leaving and regardless of how he had responded, showing off a healthy strut to demonstrate defiance.  

The match was drawn, thanks to great fight from the tail, particularly by Nalinda Premachandra and the baby of that side, Chandana Jayakody. The score read 135 for 8 at the end.  

Graham says that Inam had his pads on, ‘just in case’ and was ready to go out and do his best, but admits ‘it was essentially the last pair out there…’  Royal saved the match and some of the credit should go to this bowling allrounder who was called upon to do something he had never done all season. He was petrified, but didn’t show it.

Circumstances are not always ideal and often it is in absolutely unfavorable situations that one is called upon to make a stand. There’s no time to complain. No time to count or worry about butterflies. In the end you have to deliver out there where the battle takes place. And you have to leave it all there too. As Graham Lawrence did.