"Every secret of a writer's soul, every experience of his life, every quality of his mind, is written large in his works"
People
send me quotable quotes. Sometimes I
remember my favorite section of the Reader’s Digest, ‘Quotable Quotes’. I don’t know if the following actually
appeared in those pages or if it was something my brother quoted by way of
remark on that section: ‘Every fiftieth quotable quote is a direct
contradiction of the first’. So Quote 1is
negated by Quote 50. Quote 2 by Quote 51 and so on. It is a quotable quote though, even though I
can’t remember him mentioning quote-author.
In a
Cartesian world this does not make sense of course, but then again life is not
a black-white thing. When one affirms
something, one simultaneously negates it.
Take the above quote, for example (I will ignore the interjection of
that mysterious and probably untenable thing referred to as ‘soul’, for
purposes of clarity and brevity).
To begin with it is physically
impossible to pen down every thought, every experience and every quality of one’s
mind. That would be taking diarizing to
lunatic extremes. It would also indicate
a self-absorption that is beyond description.
It would, thirdly, indicate that someone really needs to get a life. And,
in the spirit of being suspicious of black-white postulation, one could say
that the diarizer wouldn’t have much to say.
Or perhaps, that exercise would give a good balance of living and
recording, who can tell?
Not everything gets written and not
because there’s no time. There are
things that get stuck in the throat. There
are things that get stuck between eyelids and therefore forbid seeing or else ‘show’
in strange refraction. So when we do
record it’s mis-record that actually happens.
There are things that don’t get
written because there’s no will to write.
There are indescribable things, after all. And sometimes, we don’t write because we don’t
want people to know or at least don’t want everyone to know.
Udayasiri Wickramaratne, in the
earlier versions of his soliloquy filled play ‘Suddek Oba Amathai (A white man addresses you), had a short
confession by ‘a frightened man’ (Baya
Una Minisek Oba Amathai) where the following observations were laid before
the audience:
‘I am scared. I am terrified that I might mistakenly do the
right thing. I am terrified that I might
say the truth by mistake. I would be
finished. That’s my greatest fear: saying
or doing the right thing.’
There are things we don’t say and
don’t do because we just can’t deal with the consequences (of people
discovering who we really are and what we really do). And what holds for everyone is true for the
writer as well. You won’t, for example,
find many political commentators openly stating bias. Well, that’s true for ‘news’ reporters and
editors too. They feign neutrality. They inscribe on persona some kind of
subscription to some ‘universal’, be it values, laws, truth or notions of
Utopia. Anyway, what this means is that
there is a part we hide, yes, a part of ‘soul’ (if you will), life experience,
quality of mind etc.
In other words, there are
silences. The things that will not get
written. The things that one tries to
block by saying ‘I will not answer that questions,’ for example.
And yet, can anyone say that the
stated reveals more than the unstated or ‘unstatable’? Do not the things we put down in words also
lie, also hide, distract, cloud and in other ways erect barrier to
reading?
There are people with vacant eyes. They reveal, in the very least, the fact that
their words should not be heard. There
are people who are silent and we read them by what they do. There are people who do and don’t say and
some who say but don’t do.
We are all read. And we are read handicapped by glint of
ignorance and arrogance. And our
inarticulate utterings do not for one moment make reading more difficult than
when we are lucid.
It all depends on the eyes that do
the reading. And eyes can at times
pierce the most formidable barrier and weave through the most complex maze of
mirrors. As long as there is humility and as long as the blindness of arrogance
is kept at bay.
3 comments:
It is possible that silences are read far more accurately than the silent parties ever imagine. It is also possible that it is because of this reading and knowing that the deafening silences are tolerated and even nurtured. Silent parties rarely have a clue how much of themselves they have revealed to knowing eyes. True, it all depends on the eyes that do the reading. Finally, it is also possible that the eyes that read pretend not to know for fear of being hit at for knowing. Helplessness all around.
‘I am scared. I am terrified that I might mistakenly do the right thing. I am terrified that I might say the truth by mistake. I would be finished. That’s my greatest fear: saying or doing the right thing.’
Some people love to live in fear when it's very simple to let go of it. Sometimes what they are scared of, is all make-believe like the monsters under the bed of a 6-year old.
Knowing or not knowing depends on the perception of the receiver and the prevalent situation. It's wise to speak the correct content at the right moment, keeping the desired endstate in focus. "Silence is gold", it is said.
Post a Comment