Eraj Ravindra Fernando is one heck of a politician. Following the incident in Hambantota where a
set of UNP parliamentarians were attacked by a mob, Fernando, captured on
camera with pistol in hand made a series of statements. First he said he didn’t have a gun and that
he had come to protect the said parliamentarians. Then he said it was a toy gun
that he carried. Finally, he said he was
instructed to go to Magampura, where it all happened, by UPFA Member of
Parliament Namal Rajapaksa. Rajapaksa
has since denied he gave any such direction.
The Headquarters Inspector of Hambantota, Anura Chandrapala,
is one heck of a police officer. He claims that the rotten egg attack was
directed not at the UNP MPs but at a journalist. He says further that the issue has been blown
out of proportion implying that it was a minor incident where some people booed
the said MPs.
The ‘spin’ is that the mob was made of people loyal to UNP
MP Sajith Premadasa, their complaint being that the visiting colleagues of Mr
Premadasa had not helped their boss during the election campaign. That’s hogwash.
The truth is that the UNP MPs were manhandled. The truth is
that the bus they and some journalists were traveling was attacked. The truth
is that the police did nothing to stop the mob.
The truth is that the police ignored the MPs when they requested
help. The truth is that this had nothing
to do with intra party animosities or disappointments. The truth is that Eraj Fernando’s various
statements make him look like a clown. He had no business to be brandishing a
gun. Claiming it was a toy turns slip
into a flat-on-face fall. Egg on the
face to boot, one might add.
What do we make of all this?
First of all, it is a positive development that the UNP has
decided to get out of its comfort zone.
The responsibility of the opposition is something more than firing off
media releases. Checking on the
government’s signature projects is a start and a good one too. To be fair, the relevant officials had not
been uncooperative. That’s a good sign
too. It is still a long way from the
Mattalas and Mahampuras to the hearts and minds of ordinary folk of course, but
these MPs deserve applause for their initiative.
Secondly, we have a local politician operating either on his
own steam or as per instructions. Either
way, he’s out of order. Indeed, if it is
the former then the issue is bigger than the errant politician. It means that
he felt this was the right thing to do, this was what would please his superiors
and this was a necessary condition for political betterment. Where did that ‘lesson’ come from? It could only come from indulgence on the
part of the party bigwigs when there were similar or worse transgressions.
Mervin Silva’s antics are too numerous to mention in full,
but Eraj seems to have been wrought from the same mould. Duminda Silva is another politician of the
ruling party ever ready to whip out a pistol and flex his muscles. The UPFA doesn’t seem to know the word
‘discipline’ or the concept ‘party discipline’.
The best that Susil Premajayantha can do when queried is to say ‘we will
conduct an inquiry’. It is doubtful
whether the UPFA has ever conducted any such inquiry into the misconduct of its
high profile members.
Finally, there’s the police.
There’s ample footage showing police officers twiddling their thumbs
while a loud mouthed thug ran riot right under their noses. The very fact that Eraj Fernando can arrogate
upon himself the responsibility (as he claimed) maintaining law and order shows
that the police is absolutely impotent. Inaction
is one thing, but there are allegations of collusion too. That’s more serious, obviously.
Karu Jayasuriya says that these kinds of acts give credence
to the kinds of charges leveled against Sri Lanka at the UNHRC. That’s stretching it a bit, but then again
the government is certainly not covering itself in glory by giving the green
light for thugs like Fernando to create situations and resolve them too in an
as-you-like-it manner.
The bottom line is that the nexus between politician and law
enforcer is unhealthy. Worse, it is an
inevitability that flows from the current constitutional arrangement. We
have Mervin and Duminda. We have Eraj.
None of them are aberrations of nature. They are all products of
specific institutional flaws. That said,
culpability cannot be laid at the door of ‘institution’; it rests squarely on
those empowered to correct flaw. Need we add that they don’t lack the necessary
numbers in Parliament to do so? Should we
not conclude that it is not inability but lack of will?
Yes, we have one heck of a constitution, one heck of a
government and one heck of an opposition.
We are, therefore, one heck of a people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment