One person is not a front.
Sometimes a single person can make a big difference, but if you want
radical social transformation that (hopefully) lasts, you will need some
pals. The problem is that when you do
need people, they are not there or they are not ready to ‘take the
streets’. Issues have a way of arriving
when we least expect them. Therefore it
is not easy to anticipate and plan when it comes to objection and protest. You turn around and you find yourself alone.
So what do we do? We
post a protest-notice as an ‘event’ on Facebook, email, share, invite, tweet
the works. There’s a lot of cheering. A lot of ‘likes’ and ‘shares’. A lot of people will say ‘I will be
there’. As you get closer to the event you
get some comments such as ‘I will be there in spirit’. Come event and you wonder what happened to
the cheering squad.
When conditions mature towards what could be called ‘a
revolutionary moment,’ friends become comrades, association based on similar
likes and dislikes turns into association marked by shared political believes
and ideological preferences. But
‘revolutionary moment’ is something that takes years to mature. Only very few would design their lives in
anticipation of such a moment. In general
people not only have multiple personalities but have multiple interests,
politics and ‘rebelling’ being just a couple of aspects among dozens of
‘concerns’. So how do you ‘recruit’?
There’s no easy answer.
And there’s no ‘perfect answer’ either. But there’s something people tend to
forget. In politics, what really, really
counts is often assumed to be shared believes or rather similar outcome
preference, and ideological agreement.
Something that is often discounted is the fact that people join people,
people stand with other people, not just on account of political loyalties but
rather personal friendship. You like
someone, trust him/her, believe him/her to be a good person, and you are more
likely to stand with him/her. If you
don’t like someone, similarly, you might be reluctant to join him/her in a
demonstration even if you were in agreement with the relevant politics.
Of course this is not to say that people don’t factor in
their own political preferences when deciding to join others. They do.
Saying ‘comrade’ is not the same as ‘feeling’ comrade. People will follow and stand by those who
think they way they do, but when it comes to crunch point, that place where the
faint-hearted pause or second-guess
themselves, that’s when both leader and the led are tested. That’s when courage comes into play. And that’s when the heart of the leader gets
factored in. He or she is followed not
just because he or she is thought to be doing the right thing but because he or
she is seen as a good person, a person of heart and a person who deserves to be
supported.
In the late eighties, not all students, including those who
considered themselves ‘radical’, supported the student movement, which was
essentially an arm (a pawn?) of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna. And yet, even those who ideologically opposed
the student movement would on occasion march with the leaders or join in some
awareness-creating campaign. Why? People the particular leader making the
request was considered to be honest, good and even ‘pure’.
It is not something that’s easy to cultivate and it would
sound silly to cultivate goodness or heart just to help along some political
project that might be picked at some point.
But there is virtue and profit in being good. In being honest. In being a person of word. In being generous. In being a friend regardless of the other
person’s political beliefs. Most
importantly, in being all these things with ‘recruitment’ being the last thing
on your mind.
Then, when ‘moment’ comes and you look around, friend will
find it easier to become comrade, enemy will be neutralized or at least
reluctant to fight you. In the end, the
world is changed for the better by good people who are prompted to go an extra
mile at critical moments.
Why do people like ‘Che’?
Why do people like Bob Marley?
Why did people like Vijaya Kumaratunga?
Why was Sarath Muttetuwegama’s untimely death lamented by people across
the political spectrum? Why would you
follow one person and not another?
Goodness. It
counts.
This is the ninth in a series of articles on rebels and rebellion written for the FREE section of 'The Nation'. 'FREE' is dedicated to youth and youthfulness.
This is the ninth in a series of articles on rebels and rebellion written for the FREE section of 'The Nation'. 'FREE' is dedicated to youth and youthfulness.
0 comments:
Post a Comment