This is the twenty fourth in a series of articles on rebels and rebellion written for the FREE section of 'The Nation'. Scroll to the end for other articles in this series. 'FREE' is dedicated to youth and youthfulness.
Long ago there was a medical student attending the
University of Peradeniya. He did his
thing. He was a gifted individual. He had lots of interests. He loved music. All kinds of music. He was a voracious reader. He read all kinds of books, in Sinhala and
English. He could talk about literature
and music, films and history. He had
interesting things to say about philosophy too.
He was a sports fan too. On top
of all this he was one of the top young chess players in the country.
This medical student was not interested in
politics. He wanted to become a doctor
and wanted to specialize in surgery. The
late 1980s were quite violent and the universities shut down frequently. Now in general medical students are among the
most lethargic when it comes to student politics. They just did their thing. They were even vilified as being
selfish. But at that time, medical
students had a fight on their hands.
They wanted the Government to shut down what was then referred to as the
Private Medical College (the North Colombo Medical College). They claimed that students of inferior
standing (in terms of A/L results) were able to become doctors just because
they were rich.
Radicalization can happen any time. Random things can radicalize young people who
are otherwise focused on their studies and careers. The issue of the private medical college
radicalized a lot of medical students of the time. Fighting perceived injustice opened their
eyes to other injustices and other struggles.
In time some of them all but abandoned the issue of the private medical
college and committed themselves to broader national struggles.
We don’t know if the medical student mentioned here
was radicalized thus. All that is known
is that when the universities were closed for a long time, the student movement
had to find different ways of mobilizing undergraduates for what they believed
was a struggle to liberate the nation from all kinds of oppression. So they set up student action committees all
over the island. Our medical student was
in charge of Gampola. We don’t know how
he first got involved or what he did to make the movement decide that he was
the best person to lead undergraduates who lived in that area. All we know is that he was in charge.
All we know is that those he mobilized were not
exactly political animals. They
certainly didn’t identify themselves as rebels.
It is not even known if they identified with the cause the way the
leaders of the movement did. What is
important here is that this regional student leader could get a lot of things
done in Gampola with very little resources and what was essentially a ragtag
‘army’ of activists at a time when there were half a dozen vigilante groups as
well as the Police and Army ‘cracking down’ on suspected rebels. Undergraduates were particularly marked. Young people were literally picked off from
the streets and ‘disappeared’.
No one in the Gampola ‘committee’ was ‘picked up’
during the time this medical student was in charge. He explained, years later: ‘I knew that not everyone was committed to
the struggle. I knew that those who
identified with the cause had different levels of commitment. I knew how far each one was ready to go. I knew what their other commitments
were. So whenever I gave anyone a task I
made sure it was within those limits. It
was always “a small thing” for the particular person. I never pushed them to the point where they
had to ask themselves “is this worth it?” Risk was something that never crossed
their minds, I made sure of this.’
He had to pay for this. In trying to ensure that his comrades
operated in a low risk environment, he made himself vulnerable. He was arrested. He was beaten up. He still thinks it is a miracle that he was
not disappeared.
There must be better ways of organizing a group,
i.e. where ensuring comrades are safe does not end up with the group losing its
leader. What is important here, however,
is that the leader had obviously taken the trouble to understand those under
his command. He clearly knew the
dimensions of their individual concerns, he knew their constraints, he knew
what their abilities were and he probably had a decent assessment of how
courageous each one was.
If you are a rebel and you have people under you, it
is important to know them. Every little
detail counts. Comrade A just might be
better at executing Part 7 of Plan C than Comrade B, but you will not know this
unless you have intimate understanding of the skills, thought-patterns, courage
and commitment of both comrades.
You have to know your comrades. And that’s not about knowing names and
addresses. It is far more complex. It can make a big difference.
Other articles in this series
Dear Rebel, please keep it short
Get ready for those setbacks
The rebel must calculate or perish
Are you ready to deceive?
Dear Rebel, 'P' is also for 'Proportion'
Dear Rebel, have you got the e-factor out of the way?
Have you carefully considered the f-word?
It is so easy to name the enemy, right?
The p-word cuts both ways
Cards get reflected in eyes, did you know?
It's all about timing
Heroes and heroism are great, but...
Recruiting for a rebellion
The R, L and H of 'Rebellion'
Pack in 'Humor' when you gather rebellion-essentials
Get ready for those setbacks
The rebel must calculate or perish
Are you ready to deceive?
Dear Rebel, 'P' is also for 'Proportion'
Dear Rebel, have you got the e-factor out of the way?
Have you carefully considered the f-word?
It is so easy to name the enemy, right?
The p-word cuts both ways
Cards get reflected in eyes, did you know?
It's all about timing
Heroes and heroism are great, but...
Recruiting for a rebellion
The R, L and H of 'Rebellion'
Pack in 'Humor' when you gather rebellion-essentials
0 comments:
Post a Comment