['The Morning Inspection' is the title of a
column I wrote for the Daily News from 2009 to 2011, one article a day,
Monday through Saturday. This is a new series. Scroll down for previous articles]
All
I remember from Grade 7 is that I never looked forward to being in
class. Grade 7, at least as far as formal education went, was made of
homework and other assignments not done or half-done, admonishment from
teachers, the occasional rebuke from my mother who was on the tutorial
staff of the same school and not being enthusiastic about showing either
of my parents the school report (marks were jotted down on the Student
Record Book — the SRB — and a parent had to sign off, indicating that
the bad news was seen).
The good memories are of moments that had
nothing to do with formal learning. The bad ones I’ve unconsciously
tried to forget. It’s hard because I was bad in most subjects, ordinary
in some and good only at English and Western Music. There’s one incident
I just can’t forget for both the trauma and the humour.
Back
then there was a category of subjects titled ‘Pre-Vocational’ and we had
to choose two, one each from subject baskets. I picked wood work and
business studies (that would be ‘Vyapara Adhyanaya’); I still don’t know
why. Wood work was fun although I wasn’t any good at it. Business
studies — I was clueless. The teacher was a fearsome and absolutely
humourless elderly man. He must have been a good teacher, but I lacked
even the basic understanding to make a call on the matter. I can’t
remember his name. He was referred to as ‘Kotiya,’ probably because of
perceived ferocity.
Kotiya gave homework. It was alright if you
made an attempt but if you didn’t he would punish with sharp strokes of
the foot ruler on the open palm. One unforgettable Monday, Kotiya
asked all the boys who had failed to do the homework to stand up. By the
time he came to me at least three other boys had got two strokes of the
foot ruler. Terrified, I tried to give an excuse.
‘My uncle got
married on Saturday and the wedding was in Kegalle,’ I started. It was
true. Then I realised that my excuse had to cover the entire weekend. I
struggled: ‘We came back on Sunday…’ I was failing: ‘I could have done
it last evening,’ I confessed, resigned to the inevitable.
Kotiya,
for reasons I still can’t fathom, said ‘You get only one stroke of the
ruler because you admitted that you haven’t done the homework!’ I was
not a good student but I was, I believe, intelligent enough to quickly
figure out that I had been rewarded unfairly — the other boys
essentially said ‘didn’t do’ and got two strokes of the ruler for THEIR
confession!
I am sure I must have muddled through Grade 7 with
admonishment and punishment. I’m sure I was never any good at coming up
with anything close to a creative and memorable excuse. I can’t even
take credit for the Kotiya reprieve. It was about 17 years later that I
learned about creative excuses being rewarded.
Michael Dear,
now the Professor Emeritus of City and Regional Planning in the College
of Environmental Design at UC Berkeley, and who taught a course on
Postmodernism at the University of Southern California at the time,
related the story. I can’t remember if it was triggered by a silly
excuse for an assignment being handed in late, and if indeed it was, I
could not have been one of the culprits (yes, I became a half-way decent
student somewhere down the line).
‘I used to work in London and
a red line was drawn at the time by which people should have signed in.
However, those who were late were given the opportunity to jot down
excuses. Whoever came up with the best excuse was pardoned.’
I
can’t remember if it was Michael who had come up with the following
classic, but all the students laughed: ‘I was on Westminster Bridge and I
stopped, looked around and wondered what is the meaning of it all!’
I
still remember recalling the incident with Kotiya and thinking how dumb
I had been. Of course, I was just 12 years old back then, but then
again I had never been able to come up with any excuse close to the one
Michael related.
Michael, a postmodernist, asked us what we had
learned from the class at the end of the semester. Some said ‘I am not a
postmodernist.’ I said, ‘Pre-modern’ and Michael asked,
good-humouredly, ‘so why did you take this class?’ ‘To learn the terms
so that I could do my politics better,’ I said. He laughed and said
something to the effect of ‘good enough.’ I never forgot his story
about excuses though.
In fact years later, having somehow managed
to complete two long essays on the very last day of the year 1999 (Y2K
fears prompted the university authorities to declare that all overdue
assignments have to be completed before midnight on December 31 or else
the particular courses will be marked ‘no credit’), I penned the
following ‘excuse’ along with essays duly attached to the email:
‘I
am sorry that I am submitting this several years after taking your
course. It’s just that I am convinced of my immortality: time just
doesn’t make any sense to me.’ I knew that both professors, Phil
McMichael and Susan Buck-Morss, were quite laid back about such things.
If it had been anyone like Kotiya, I might not have risked being so
cheeky.
Looking back, I feel that I did graduate with a degree
in creative excuses thanks to Michael, although I’ve not had the
opportunity to use those skills — editors are simply unforgiving when it
comes to meeting deadlines!
Other articles in this series:
Books launched and not-yet-launched
The sunrise as viewed from sacred mountains
Isaiah 58: 12-16 and the true meaning of grace
The age of Frederick Algernon Trotteville
Live and tell the tale as you will
Between struggle and cooperation
Neruda, Sekara and literary dimensions
Paul Christopher's heart of many chambers
Calmness gracefully cascades in the Dumbara Hills
Serendipitous amber rules the world
0 comments:
Post a Comment