06 October 2025

The land that time should not make us forget

 

Sometime in the late seventies or maybe in the early eighties I watched with considerable fascination a film titled ‘The land that time forgot.’ This film, based on a novel of the same name in 1918 by Edgar Rice Burroughs. Burroughs is probably better known as the creator of Tarzan, a character that fed white supremacist ideologies. Burroughs’ vivid imagination gave us dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals long before Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park, based on Michael Crichton’s 1990 novel, did.

The book, and the film of course, are temporally located at the time of the First World War when the crews of two vessels, one British and another German, astray in Antarctic waters chance upon an island which, contrary to all known natural processes, thrives in a climate that supports all kinds of species, long thought to be extinct.

Watchable.

This is not about the films, the books, authors or story-lines, but simply the title: The land that time forgot. I was reminded of this title while thinking of Frantz Fanon’s ‘The Wretched of the Earth.’ That, and his ‘Black Skin, White Masks.’ Essential reading, so I tell my daughters, for these are basic texts that reveal the ways in which peoples in countries such as ours which have been ravaged and plundered continue to suffer the enduring effects of such processes.

Fanon, in ‘The Wretched of the Earth,’ speaks of land, hence the above preamble: ‘For a colonized people the most essential value, because the most concrete, is first and foremost the land: the land which will bring them bread and, above all, dignity.’

Land. Key.

Land theft has been the A-Z of all invasions, colonial or otherwise. It is done at gun-point. Slaughter is at the heart of the process. Gripping, twisting and destroying minds can and do facilitate. This is why Bishop Desmond Tutu once said, ‘first we at the land and they had the book; then they said, “close your eyes, let us pray,” and when we opened our eyes, we had the book and they had the land.”’

Land of course, straight up, is territory. It is typically imagined in terms of extent, square-somethings. It yields food and dignity, Fanon was correct. Wrest it away and those on the land have no place to stand, metaphorically speaking. They are forced to beg for tenurial arrangements, they are forced into relations of production that are exploitative and moreover erode dignity and self-belief in innumerable ways. That’s what the Waste Lands Ordinance 1 of 1897 did, quite apart from straight-forward annexing of territory. The history of the world, come to think of it, is all about processes associated with land theft and resistance to imminent robbery, with fire-power or legislation.

But I am thinking of ‘land’ as a metaphor. Land as a metaphor for all things owned or are associated with entitlements of one kind of another. Culture, for example. History. Heritage. Lifestyle. Things and processes which confer meaning and value to our existence. When these are denied or, worse, when we are taught to consider such things as being of lesser or no value whatsoever and, even worse, are persuaded to consciously and actively join hands with the thief to dismiss, denigrate and even vilify it all, then and then alone are we truly dispossessed.

This process involves masks. We have black (or brown) skins, but since we are unable to replace such colours with white, it is suggested that we wear white masks. Not everyone needs such persuasion of course, They are many who wear masks for reasons of convenience if not conviction. It’s about mimicking the oppressor and indeed emulating the oppressor in the acts of oppression. Success for the oppressor, at least in this respect, arrives when the wearer of masks truly believes that the mask has replaced original skin. Doesn’t happen that way, but belief is a powerful lie that can enable the sustained development of oppression, the attendant extraction of wealth and further colonisation of minds.

Mask-wearers willingly concede territory. They are ever-ready to be consoled by crumbs yielded by negotiating the terms of oppression. They give up land. They support land-theft. Then they protect thieves and justify theft. They convince themselves that crumbs offered as compensation are actually feasts. They wear their masks with pride. They are divested of dignity and hurrah the divestiture. They are among the worst of those who can be called the wretched of the earth. Caricatures. Cartoons. Approvers of crimes against humanity. Applauders of those who would erase history, obliterate heritage and force fellow-territorials to be subjected to insults and humiliation.

Land is not just square-somethings. Land is made also of heart and mind, of knowledge and knowing, of the conscious and a conscience. That land, torn and yet beautiful, has seen the ravages of time. It carries signs that yell, ‘forget, forget, forget!’

We should not.

[This article was published in the Daily News under the weekly column title ‘The Recurrent Thursday’]


 

0 comments: