I may have never heard of Barclay Jones if one of his students, Kanishka Goonewardena, hadn’t chanced upon some terraced paddy fields in my company.
Barclay G Jones, Cornell professor of city and
regional planning and regional science, I now know, was a noted expert
on protecting historic structures from earthquake damage and on the
social and economic devastation of national disasters.
He was
Kanishka’s assigned supervisor when he began reading for a doctorate at
Cornell in the Department of City and Regional Planning. Kanishka
remembers him as someone who had vast empirical knowledge and a man of
integrity.
Anyway, as we walked along a ridge high above the
waters that would eventually fall into the Heen Ganga with paddy fields
descending from the foot of the towering mountains beyond presided over
by the majestic Lakegala whose peak was cloud-shrouded that morning of
light drizzle and damped pathways, Kanishka shared with me an
observation made by the professor, as he remembered it.
‘I
have seen all kinds human and natural environments in the world and I
can understand how all these were produced or evolved—except terraced
paddy fields. I simply cannot understand how anyone could have planned
and constructed such intricate and marvellous landscapes. They just
boggle my mind.’
And he spoke about hillside houses, hundreds of
them, in certain areas of Europe, particularly Italy. These were
probably built over a long period of time, with increasing population
and growing demand resulting in empty spaces being used to build houses.
In the manner of typical urban expansion. They are
picture-postcard-pretty, but then the long view tends to be. Tiny
spaces, lack of greenery and lots and lots of brick and cement might not
make for easy breathing.
It’s one thing to build houses on such
terrain and quite another to cultivate. Given that they require
irrigation systems which enable optimal use of rainfall or water sources
across a territory with multiple owners, certain solidarities are
implied. More importantly, as Kanishka pointed out, it must take
something special for anyone to look at a sloping landscape covered in
thick jungle (‘like all this,’ he said, waving his hand to indicate the
mountains surrounding the area, all covered in jungle) and visualise
terraced paddy fields.
While terraced cultivation has been
practiced in mountainous regions in South America and Northern Portugal,
terraced paddy fields are almost exclusively found in Asia. Those of
Japan, Nepal, Indonesia, Vietnam and China are truly spectacular. In
these regions too, a long time ago, people would have cast gaze on hills
covered in trees and visualised a treeless landscape, all terraced
tinged in blue-grey hue or gold as the grain ripens. They would have
calculated the difference in elevation of adjacent terraces, figured out
how best water could be diverted to the top most terrance and how it
should be released to the one below and the one below that and so on.
It
could not have been, unlike in the case of destroying the upper
catchments to plant tea, a meticulously planned affair taking into
account weather patterns, soil composition, the possibility of erosion
etc.
Theoretically, any hill could be transformed into a
terraced landscape. Which hill, though? How and for what purpose? For
how long? For whom? Such questions don’t come easy to the mind. After
all, how many reading this can claim that they saw a hill and thought
‘could be turned into terraced paddy fields’? How many over the
centuries looked upon deserts and thought, ‘someday all this will become
infrastructure’? How many experienced processes of political economy
and thought, ‘state!’ or ‘deep state’? How many saw a population and
saw a people, saw people and thought ‘community,’ imagined a community
and designed strategies that tapped into or generated solidarity?
The
hills are alive with…the sound of music? Sure. The hills were not
terraced paddy fields back in the day, but there was a song about rice,
land preparation, irrigation, cultivation, harvests and food. Only, not
everyone heard. Some did and among those who did there were special
kinds of planners, visionaries and practitioners who saw and could turn vision into
reality.
We see hills but don’t see paddy fields. We see paddy
fields and don’t see the forests they replaced? We see a rock but don’t
see ‘the Thathaagatha,’ we see the Thathaagatha but not the rock from which a sculptor one day drew out the Enlightened One.
Barclay G Jones, who died in 1997, saw terraced landscapes. He may have reflected deeply on the phenomenon, asked relevant questions and was perhaps inspired to plan and implement transformations of one kind or another. One thing is certain. He planted a seed in the mind of a student many years ago; some fruit was harvested.
Other articles in this series:
Of ants, bridges and possibilities
From A through Aardvark to Zyzzyva
Words, their potency, appropriation and abuse
Who did not listen, who's not listening still?
If you remember Kobe, visit GOAT Mountain
The world is made for re-colouring
No 27, Dickman's Road, Colombo 5
Visual cartographers and cartography
Ithaca from a long ago and right now
Lessons written in invisible ink
The amazing quality of 'equal-kindness'
The interchangeability of light and darkness
Sisterhood: moments, just moments
Chess is my life and perhaps your too
Reflections on ownership and belonging
The integrity of Nadeesha Rajapaksha
Signatures in the seasons of love
To Maceo Martinet as he flies over rainbows
Fragrances that will not be bottled
Colours and textures of living heritage
Countries of the past, present and future
Books launched and not-yet-launched
The sunrise as viewed from sacred mountains
Isaiah 58: 12-16 and the true meaning of grace
The age of Frederick Algernon Trotteville
Live and tell the tale as you will
Between struggle and cooperation
Neruda, Sekara and literary dimensions
Paul Christopher's heart of many chambers
Calmness gracefully cascades in the Dumbara Hills
Serendipitous amber rules the world
0 comments:
Post a Comment