Whitney Houston’s 'I will always love you,' is a classic letting-go song. No in-denial in it. No anger or thoughts of revenge. No bargaining, no if-thens or if-not-why-nots. No talk of starting over, a second chance, forgives and forgets or pledges to do things different this time. Sadness, but no depression. Acceptance is what it is.
Of course, grieving, whichever form it may take, is not a linear process that goes from denial to acceptance. There could be closure, but then again no one can say with finality that there’s no going back. Human beings have memories. We revisit. And even from the distances yielded by time we can and do relive; at some point in revisitation we encounter and embrace ‘damn,’ weep, sigh and entertain what-ifs and maybes. Narratives, in short, don’t necessarily end when chapters are closed. Acceptance does not forbid grief or grieving.
Someone becomes someone else’s past tense, but that doesn’t necessarily work both ways, especially not when the relationship was about an experienced moment or present tense unutterably beautiful or held that promise and a long tomorrow in which no other name could even remotely make sense.
Love and romance: some believe, like Pablo Neruda did, that it is certainly beautiful but only at the beginning. We use those words and somehow feel compelled to use them about people we are with even though they’ve changed as we have, even though warts never imagined or anticipated have become visible or have, as the case may be, materialised. It may not be the love of those first soft petalled days, but neither is it something absolutely devoid of tender feelings.
It could be the same with those who made us their past tense and who, in time, we’ve added to our past tense. Regrets there could be, for nostalgia is always a heartbeat away. And yet, we’ve accepted: that which was and which was projected is no more and has moved out of the realm of possibility.
What is most memorable about the song is this line: ‘I hope that you have all that you ever dreamed of, I do wish you joy, I wish you happiness, but above all this, I wish you love.’ And yet, ‘I love you, I will always love you.’
That is the expression of fidelity to the quality of muditha in the sathara brahma viharana or the ‘four divine abodes,’ the other three being loving-kindness, compassion and equanimity.
But what is this ‘love’ spoken about in this song? Is it the romantic love related to shared lives, relationships and planned futures or something else? The lyricist would know. While Whitney Houston’s soul-ballad arrangement for the film ‘The Bodyguard’ is better known, the original was written and recorded in 1973 by Dolly Parton. Apparently it was written as a farewell to her business partner and mentor Porter Wagoner, following Dolly’s decision to pursue a solo career. Nothing romantic about it, at least not in the classical meaning of the word.
Songs don’t belong only to lyricists and singers, though. And it is therefore a love song. It is about heartbreak and an assertion of the everlasting. The lyricist doesn’t elaborate on the word ‘love,’ doesn’t tell us what kind of love and whether or not that kind of love that inspired the song would remain intact in depth and nature of feeling across a lifetime.
It is undeniable that the sentiments are soft, they are devoid of anger and that the vibes are all positive, all good. If we take it as a heartbreak song or rather a post-heartbreak song, the wounds and hurt notwithstanding, what’s left, as the song goes, are memories which although bitter are nevertheless sweet as well.
Love, if it is not the kind envisaged, is too often footnoted, scorned or erased from minds and hearts. However, if you live to be 93 there will be many moments where old loves will give a kind of warmth that will be embraced as blessings. No rancour, no regrets, no need to anticipate with relish or foreboding any number of futures that can only be too heavy for weary and ancient shoulders. They know. We know. No gripping hard, no casual rejection. A caressing, then. As soft-petalled as the blush of love’s first flush.
Just a different flower. Love, still. Loving. Always.
['The Morning Inspection' is the title of a
column I wrote for the Daily News from 2009 to 2011, one article a day,
Monday through Saturday. This is a new series. Links to previous articles in this new series are given below]
Other articles in this series:
Authors are assassinated, readers are immortal
It is good to be conscious of nudities
Saturday slides in after Monday and Sunday somersaults into Friday
There's a one in a million and a one in ten
Kumkum Fernando installs Sri Lanka in Coachella, California
Hemantha Gunawardena's signature
Architectures of the demolished
The exotic lunacy of parting gifts
Who the heck do you think I am?
Those fascinating 'Chitra Katha'
So how are things in Sri Lanka?
The sweetest three-letter poem
Teams, team-thinking, team-spirit and leadership
The songs we could sing in lifeboats when we are shipwrecked
Jekhan Aruliah set a ball rolling in Jaffna
Awaiting arrivals unlike any other
Teachers and students sometimes reverse roles
Colombo, Colombo, Colombo and so forth
The slowest road to Kumarigama, Ampara
Some play music, others listen
Mind and hearts, loquacious and taciturn
I am at Jaga Food, where are you?
On separating the missing from the disappeared
And intangible republics will save the day (as they always have)
The circuitous logic of Tony Muller
Rohana Kalyanaratne, an unforgettable 'Loku Aiya'
Mowgli, the Greatest Archaeologist
Figures and disfigurement, rocks and roses
Sujith Rathnayake and incarcerations imposed and embraced
Some stories are written on the covers themselves
A poetic enclave in the Republic of Literature
Landcapes of gone-time and going-time
The best insurance against the loud and repeated lie
So what if the best flutes will not go to the best flautists?
There's dust and words awaiting us at crossroads and crosswords
A song of terraced paddy fields
Of ants, bridges and possibilities
From A through Aardvark to Zyzzyva
Words, their potency, appropriation and abuse
Who did not listen, who's not listening still?
If you remember Kobe, visit GOAT Mountain
The world is made for re-colouring
No 27, Dickman's Road, Colombo 5
Visual cartographers and cartography
Ithaca from a long ago and right now
Lessons written in invisible ink
The amazing quality of 'equal-kindness'
The interchangeability of light and darkness
Sisterhood: moments, just moments
Chess is my life and perhaps your too
Reflections on ownership and belonging
The integrity of Nadeesha Rajapaksha
Signatures in the seasons of love
To Maceo Martinet as he flies over rainbows
Fragrances that will not be bottled
Colours and textures of living heritage
Countries of the past, present and future
Books launched and not-yet-launched
The sunrise as viewed from sacred mountains
Isaiah 58: 12-16 and the true meaning of grace
The age of Frederick Algernon Trotteville
Live and tell the tale as you will
Between struggle and cooperation
Neruda, Sekara and literary dimensions
Paul Christopher's heart of many chambers
Calmness gracefully cascades in the Dumbara Hills
Serendipitous amber rules the world
1 comments:
In the movie, Rachel and Frank at least stayed together for a short while! Lucky they were.
Post a Comment